+1

+1

For the Cargo Ships Oil Rig sub-entities, I ended up making it rotatable (so blueprints work) and have a script that immediately un-rotates it. This suggestion would add options for how to handle cars like this.

Here are the Suggestions threads to reference:

Main thread on parameter merging: https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=129487
Other threads that mention parameter merging:
https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=131657
https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=128745
https://forums ...

This is a very old thread that probably counts as "implemented" at this point!

Previous threads with the same suggestion (ignoring the ones that want to copy/reassign individual records in a schedule/interrupt segment)

https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?p=627132 (another thread was already merged into this one)
https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?p=673986 (I ...

+1.

As a user interface design aspect, is there a compelling reason to *prevent* the user from making a copy of an interrupt so they can e.g. change the name and quantity of the fuel? (Because the fuel wildcard is useless when fuel items have different stack sizes.)

Other semi-hidden global lists ...

+1

Wouldnit be correct summarize like this? This report is basically a suggestion that those entries be reworded as "All/Any *active* request not/satisfied". Active meaning any request that is not grayed out at the present space location. This is what was implied and could easily be made explicit.

When your inserters pick up ingredients to supply the foundries, the item isn't on the belt any more, so it isn't counted any more, so the recipe is detected as having not enough ingredients any more, so it is not set as recipe any more.

This is a frequent design error. There are usually 2 ...

Even if it had worked like you expected, it would still overshoot by 0-20 units of fluid every time. The pump only checks the circuit condition once per tick and moves up to 20 units of fluid per tick ((1200/sec) / (60 ticks/sec)). Sushi pipes only work when you have circuit-controlled filtered ...

+1

Furthermore, changing from a static priority function to a dynamic one would involve adding a boolean memory value to every inserter and making it save-load consistent to avoid desyncs. It's not impossible, but it's not simpler than a GUI change. Even then, it's not a guarantee of perfectly even ...

Go to the Load Game menu and click the save file.Click the Sync mods with save button in the top-right corner of the menu.The game will automatically match your mods to that save


Don't forget the part that actually solves OPs problem: uncheck "Load save after restart" in the sync mods dialog ...

This thread might explain why I found hidden items/entities that appeared in the "to" field but not in the "from" field. I ended up making them not hidden so that they would appear on both sides.

In a discussion thread, I raised the idea of having separate minimum *and* maximum values for both planet and platform transfers. That way, you could set the "planet supply threshold" to be higher than the "platform supply threshold", and the difference would always be reserved to supply platforms ...

The default value of the setting is set during the settings stage and the recipe ratio is set during the data stage. Both are completed before the game loads to menu and cannot be changed automatically based on what save file is subsequently loaded.

The best you can do is a warning message that ...

I think the comparison to quality transfer mode is not quite accurate, because remap mode would require manual entry of each input and output signal (basically the same number of clicks as to configure separate arithmetic combinators). Quality transfer mode can remap all signals with one user ...

FWIW, I am the maintainer of AutoDeconstruct and know that not everyone likes it as a concept.

Asking for a vanilla feature is a valid request, and it's also valid for the devs to judge the popularity of a request by how many downloads the mod inplementing it has.

The other deconstruction planner ...

This is a cool idea and your mock-up is very helpful. It seems like one of the functions would be to add multiple signals together into one output. For example, your mock-up could be made now with three arithmetic combinators that add each pair of signals into the three output signals. Is that a ...

The deconstruction planner supports up to 1000 filters in 2.1.


I can remove items on the ground but I can't remove empty drills
Can you add a filter to remove empty mining drills? In 2.0, an empty indicator was added. It would be logical to automate deconstruction using the deconstruction ...

Thank you!