Placing rail ghost and then using an upgrade planner to change the quality of the rail ghost causes the client to crash (in multiplayer only).

I gave huge pages a shot on my i7-8700k and managed to get the best benchmark to date with Factorio 1.0.0. :D
109 UPS baseline
125 UPS with huge pages
Sorted list of benchmarks to date

I made some slight changes to the variables/steps listed in this reddit post .

sudo sysctl -w vm.nr ...

HeyHarry3636 wrote: Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:57 am Using Ctrl-c, you don't have the ability to edit the copy before placing.

Hold shift before releasing the mouse and you get an edit window.

Whoops... Fixed.

Now why is there such a big difference.
You have a map on the website version 0.17.31
Therefore, on any other version other than 0.17.31, the save file is first converted to the current version, and then testing. This is where 7 UPS is lost.


This should not be the case. Benchmarks do not ...

As you can see, the difference in 7 UPS is quite significant, someone will have more.
I certainly understand that everything is in the same conditions, and the results are therefore valid,
but maybe you need to change the amount of update time in the script,
(instead of 1000, make 5000/10000?) to ...

See screenshot. Ghosts resulting from destroying entities cannot be upgraded via upgrade planner.

I ran into this in 0.18.45. Here's a short clip demonstrating the problem.

Hello.
I did 20 or 30 tests today. But I don’t see a single result in the database on the site :)
Here is the last attempt, I copied it from the console:
https://factoriobox.1au.us/result/a3f99d5a-0a64-4e3e-a3a2-8ad2ebb2883f

Benchmark Results
There was an error parsing this benchmark. I've ...

104 ups vs 101 on the site
95 vs 93 - on the screen of my computer,


Hey! I was wondering where all these benchmarks were coming from. I'm the creator of the website. :)

I wasn't expecting such a variance (a steady increase in performance at that) between runs on the same machine so I didn't ...

Entering [gps=d0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34fd0d3b34f] and shrinking the window to ensure it has to line wrap causes a line to be shown for each character it seems.
Screenshot from 2019-12-21 00-39-06.png

This has ...

This has since been fixed as a result of 71990 changing the rail bounding boxes slightly.

Well, I was going to do this, but it turns out my build would require more ore patches and I guess I would be allowed to add more, but at that point I'm just not interested enough. Probably wasn't gonna work.


What did you have in mind? I thought my build took up quite a lot of room, but it ...

I made a *very* marginal improvement to my belt-only build.

Well, looks like I have some catching up to do.

For those who are interested, there's been a lot of design discussion happening in the Technical Factorio discord: https://discord.gg/8RqPQYM

Congrats on the sub 40 second time, Dave.

Ok, I'm turning in my map so I can at least take second place while I can. :P

I tried to maximize direct insertion as much as possible for this build, which ended up being 6 beacons on the assembling machines. I didn't expect it to perform so well, but apparently it's pretty competitive. On my ...

Furnace crafting progress and productivity are not cloned. Works the same for all furnace tiers.

Items on belts are cloned to a position slightly ahead of the original.

Bottom belts are the source, top are the clones.

I too have run into this issue. I've found that running a Factorio server inside docker with an image from https://github.com/factoriotools/factorio-docker works normally, however, when I build the image myself from the Dockerfile, it advertises port 1024 to the server list for a while until it ...