Coal shortage incoming !

the first GTAs showed elevations just fine, and they were top-down. I'm not saying it's easy, but it seems feasible.
And DMA Design was the equivalent of modern-day indie devellopers.

The game's about robots. Robot's a czech word, so perhaps playing the czech version wouldn't undermine understanding

I hope the company goes with a name like FrozenGames or something to poke at paypal .

One day you'll have to show us your todo list so we can laugh at the absurd length of it.

Well my current factory has 4 lines of 12 ovens. 2 lines for iron, 2 lines for copper. Absolutely no problem feeding them with coal, altho I do have two coal lines.

I'll just try to put steam and wiki in all my post one way or another to mess with you.

Also, if we want to be realistic, power could degrade somewhat the further away it is from the source. Yes, that would make burned versions of things a lot of use. Dibs on the first place in the queue in front of the burned laser turret shop... If you want to be realistic you also add transformers ...

It has been talked about in "more flexible inserters" FYI

Wasn't refering your suggestion but the two screens on the first page. Sorry, should have been clearer.

But you still cannot automatically feed combustion inserters.

We are inaugurating the french version of the wiki ! Unfortunately, there is limited contribution on the wiki, when the game contains a tons of things to be documented. I know I may be carried away by creating such a post on my own and not letting the mods do their business... Contributing is really...

You could imagine that the arm of the inserter could only go down on certain limited axis, and not in a 360° row. I think it may be overpowered otherwise.

You can do a right angle with two inserters pretty easily. It just takes up more room to do so.

It is ill-advised to put your adress open on the internet... Behold the spam.

You can use a rocket launcher to destroy the guard turrets.

Yes, but we want the power output, not the performance. When you drive a car, do you determin speed using the speedometer, or using the RPM measure ? of course you use the speedometer. Same thing. EDIT: To be more clear, when I read about a power plant, I don't care of the speed at which the turbine...

I didn't neither. But it's just not the right wording. That's a matter of fact and I pointed that out.
If there was plenty of typos in a text, you'd still understand it, but does that makes absolutely no difference on how the text feels ?

Depletion of smaller water body only then. If it also applies to the bigger ones it's highly unrealistic. The water cycle should refill large lakes easily.

Maybe it has been thought of before but wouldn't "Energy Output" be more appropriate ?
Like: "Power Output" and "Max Output"