Many in favor of space casino argue that mod could disable it. And now using a mod to enable it is not acceptable ! Pure hypocrisy !
(and honestly anyone who argue space casino is hard to do is blind)


It's easy to call other people hypocrites lol, i think you have to be one yourself to pretend ...

This subject have been debated in others threads , all possibles points have already been made, create yet another thread is disrespectful to previous discussions.


Your are wrong, you are mistaking a suggestion to remove quality module in crusher entirely vs only in the reprocessing receipe ...

It look nice and official, and thanks for sharing ,it's interesting to see the code !

Now if you just wanted a platform with a specific shape, you could also have used one of the existing tool :lol: :

https://factorio-blueprint.vercel.app/image-converter-tile
https://mlctrez.github.io ...

Factorio feels like a well oiled machine everything is so easy to do but quality breaks that for me. It has so many exceptions and so much brainless fiddling that doesn't exist in other parts of the game.


I have not contradicted that ! To me an upgrade planner for quality "may not be enough ...

So, I genuinely forget if you can hook splitters up to circuits (I think you can?), but I do know for sure that with filter splitters, you can do *X quality and better*.


You can hook splitters to circuits, but it's quite new and i'm not too familiar with it, though i'm pretty sure i remember ...

Why doesn't this have more support? Its extremely tedious to change tens of recipes for each rarity.


You may use the hotkey to "copy paste" (shift right click/left click ) a receipe from a machine to another, and keep it pressed to change a whole row, also works when copy pasting an assembly ...

Note: Not every component is legendary. Sorry about that, my current base is lacking some legendaries, but you have the idea.


1) doesn't illustrate why one would use green module and think it's space efficient
2) doesn't mean idea is viable with higher quality modules

The idea of placing ...

I'm confused, it sounds like all the good stuff people wanted are added to game, but you are telling it all in one FFF ? Are there any other goodies left to reveal for the next one or are we this close to 2.1 ? :lol:
I suspect the less popular changes , namely about balances are kept for later ? :p ...

Here is my challenge:
I say that this is the best "space optimised" solution


So first observation it doesn't contain pollution reducing modules. Obviously contradicting your previous point.
Second : Why do you not use modules with some quality level ? It makes things harder because there's more ...

Why would I do such thing? That was efficient before space age. With new beacon mechanics this setup is very obsolete and you should use green modules in your beacons mostly if you really seek for the best setup.


You do whatever you want, but since the title of the thread is "smallest possible ...

Hey, there's really no need to be so nasty. Not cool at all.


Some people do that for engagement like trolls, when what they say is usually ignored, the claim become more and more grotesque, which is funny when it is done with such repetition, you gotta appreciate the irony when that one troll ...

Out of curiosity: what is the design you used to fit 8 thrusters into platform of width 32? I am trying to come up with efficient design and unless I would do some thruster-far-in-the-north shenanigans it seems impossible to me to fit 8 thrusters next to each other on a platform of width 32. I ...

Sorry i had forgotten to add the /sarcasm ^^

And as I said, if you have at least 4 kovarexes, you dont need any chests too. Just inserters from one machine to another.


If you do that you can't use fully beaconned setup though.

Chests are nice, but cars or tanks too, because they are larger chest, so you can easily have 2 inserters ...

Wait that's the same plan as last time ?! It's reassuring in a way to see that things ARE going according to the plan, but it's also an inacurate title some of plans are for beyond 2.1 ! :lol:

It sound like a good news for the game if new hires are made, and for the Wube company in general, even ...

I prefer Fulgora and Gleba for the differences they introduce but i don't think Vulcanus deserve hates, i feel it's more the megabaser planet rather than puzzle-solving one, if one was to put simplistic labels. If you didn't have those little lava spots and terrain "annoyances" , it'd be even worse ...

I don't want to translate anymore. You can look at the blueprint I posted in https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=133170 to understand the GCD part. Actually, what I'm doing is multiplying the inverses of the matrices I provided.


I am very thankful for the explanations ! Sorry i did not ...

I like the look of it , wondering what it look likes when bots charges, we can see the charging area and i like the way it explains how you can store so many bots in a roboport , it remind me of some bike parking we have near my place where they get swallowed by the machine like this x)

Maybe the ...

So apparently train stops kinda do this already since 0.15 where they add a 2000 tile pathfinding penalty when pathing through them


Yes !

Also what quyxkh says is true, you can find more informations on those penalties here : https://wiki.factorio.com/Railway/Train_path_finding

the penalty ...