LTN is completely requester controlled. As long as requesters keep up, active providers are easily achieved by higher provide priority. It works fine, but it throws an error message because of the mismatched content, which is irritating. The train was loaded with something not in schedule, so workin...

Duplicate of https://github.com/Yousei9/Logistic-Tra ... issues/252

Sounds overly complicated.
3 stations each requesting 100k of everything would be automatically balanced by LTN.

Questions like this make me wonder what some of you guys try to build.

LTN Content Reader might be granular enough depending on how you set up Network ID.

At best you'd expose lua directly like LuaCombinator3.

I see no point in coming up with some made up assembly language to be interpreted by lua.
The few cases where I could see myself using micro controllers they will always be too slow to make any practical sense.

Threshold handling was not touched by 1.6.0, I see no way it would break in the way you describe.
Check your circuitry.

Downgrade is not supported.
Though nothing is stopping you from downloading an old version from github and load an older safe with it.

Can't replicate.

Deliveries trigger perfectly when going under request threshold.

I wish they'd remove all those half working checks, let us pipe different fluids in one pipe again and just add a fluid filter option for pumps.

+1
Would be nice to have.

PS: In SC2 that feature was required to get any efficiency, since building some things took forever.

Are you talking about the input temperature of the boiler or the fluid temperature? Heat Exchangers basically do what you want, only work above 500° input temperature. Gradual fluid temperatures however where removed mid 0.15 and are not coming back. Now we have to create different fluid prototypes ...

Fixed in 1.16.0

Switching train selector to use table sort was simpler than squeezing priority into the old structure.

Seems like I messed up big when writing the depot priority code.
It never could have worked as intended and still yours is the first bug report after over a year since it was introduced.

It will take time to properly fix it.

First check if the correct signals are sent to the stop.

Should the problem persist enable debug log, attach factorio-current.log and tell me which depot to look for.

ptx0 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 21, 2021 2:05 pm

doesn't it poll every n ticks even for automatic trains?

Technically yes, but it reads from a cached entity and doesn't have to run find_entities to see if the thing is still there.

You're looking for https://mods.factorio.com/mods/Optera/Inventory%20Sensor mods have to implement this in a really performance intensive manner, but the base game could implement it as a part of the entity update. Yes, polling trains (in manual mode) and cars really hurt performance. That's why IS...

According to the mod description "ore without an ore patch" I assume that some of the "Quarry $something" named mods work like that. https://mods.factorio.com/query/quarry?version=any If it's an actual engine limit it might be worth a shot to post a link to this thead on the per...

I didn't have issues with inserters miss crabbing the cycling u235 either, but it might be an issue especially in noob friendly builds.
Without circuit control there's no way to limit input inventory to just 40 or 80 u235, but I wouldn't call it noob friendly anymore.

Read through the posts between disentius and me about the circuit controlled version.

I think it was mine. https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?p=391015#p391015 Still using it. That's very outdated, you really use the 2018 setup when you made much more reliable ones since? one circuit free version: https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?p=509952#p509952 and the circuit contr...

If you also want that drill to be affected by mining productivity research you'll have to use hidden beacons with productivity modules and update them in control.