I would like to add, that increased breaking strength is not as straight forward imho:


If a train approaches a crossing or something similar, where the reason for the stop is another train blocking the crossing that might leave the crossing in the next few seconds, the train with fewer breaking ...

I'd like to add my feedback as well. I guess there's no point in creating new feedback threads where there are already some, so I took the one that looked the most open. Even if it sounds as criticism, I'd like to say I immensely enjoy all parts of Factorio. Just some parts not as immense as ...

Best argument IMHO that was not mentioned is that electric furnaces reduce the logistic requirements. You don't have to bring ore AND coal to the furnaces, just ore! That makes the build much easier and increases scalability by a huge margin!

First Patch in SA that changed something really annoying for me Loving, that we can set the decider output can be configured.

I would like to see conditions without any normalform. I don't get why it was implemented in the current way. Another option would be to copy and paste parts of conditions ...

I was in a similar place. Well my multiplayer mates played factorio a little bit but did not have the experience. The best way for me was to have the big picture in mind and give tasks for the other players(some players like to be given clear tasks) :

Keep an eye on the scale on the different ...

TL;DR
Please add the option to bind toolbelt rows (or toolbelt configuration) to surfaces


What?
There should be an option to switch the toolbelt configuration based on what surface you are (or what you are looking at in the remote view.). It could be, that you setup 4 rows for a planet and the ...

I agree that the initial space science (white flasks) is a little bit dull, because you don't have to scale it later.
I am fine with moving technologies to other planets that were at Nauvis in the first place. At first i was a bit annoyed by this, but it feels much more rewarding as it would be ...

There are informations, that are found in one of both places, but i think they should be moved to the other locations or kept in both:


Quality probabilities table should additionally be attached to all quality modules
Asteroids spawning rates should additionally be placed at the pedia entry of ...

You can get fractions if you multiply the devisor by 10 before dividing and will get 5 instead of 0.5 - it is limited by precision and will not work for huge numbers, but in many cases this worked for me

OK I think you did not understand my problem. For example, I require 12 basic underground ...

You can get fractions if you multiply the devisor by 10 before dividing and will get 5 instead of 0.5 - it is limited by precision and will not work for huge numbers, but in many cases this worked for me

I don't get why people dislike Gleba that much. I like the logistic challenge and the progression through the planet is smooth. There are many ways to handle spoilage and you have to priorize products and chains..

Well visiting it as the third planet is easy - enemiea might be a little harder if ...

Naming a Train Station with Multiple Names might work for some part of the problem...

You made my day. I posted a similar question in the Train Interrupt FFF and got no answer.
I feel building dedicated stations for products extremely space consuming.

The main problem with using wildcards is, that you can not place multiple icons in station names dynamically - might be capped at 2 ...

Some of this might be valid, some of this might be more like :

«I spent 2 hours in my first freeplay game to fill my ore fields with burner drills and making a self-powering burner inserter coal field setup, now I have to throw it all away that I have made a boiler and steam engine and I have ...

For me the pacing of the technologies is a bit off. I don't like the idea, that building something up and throwing it all out of the window if something better is available. For me vanilla Factorio was about "getting something better, fiddling with it a bit and be happy, that it's working better by ...

Well it has nothing todo with language, but like the map search that was introduced in 2.0 - but i would like to have an additional map search where not the build producing the searched item is found but the entitiy in the world. <Might be better placed as a suggestion>

Recyclers destroy items - what other way you would want to add?


A more direct way. There is a 25% chance i get a stone back when recycling a stone. It's not the biggest problem in the world to rout it around and back to the recycler. But i find it a bit annoying when i just want to get rid of ...

I was about to make this suggestion, when i discovered making multi-item dynamic request stations is virtually impossible. Or too hard
I really want to be able to play without mods (cause achievements), and single-item logistic train stations are okay, but having a regex expression matcher would ...

I agree with many points. Most Changes make little to no difference in the long run but would make the journey more enjoyable. I totally agree, that calcite should be available easier on Nauvis. Putting the access to Gleba is just mäh.

You have some great improvement ideas!o

I would like to add ...

I like the idea behind freezing the whole base. But it looks for me just like a annoyance on the long run. Maybe i am a bit off, but looks a bit boring. Imho it would be more unique to grow your land from the liquid around you. But that is just me.

I like the way the railgun shows off, but the self ...