vark111, I want to personally thank you for not making me create a new topic just to revive an old topic from 2020 to reply to a few people... In "Else output for decider combinator" ( https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=64173&start=20 ) people were explaining how "...

I mouse-over'd over a construction bot recharging at a standard (non-personal) roboport on Aquilo and its info card showed a minimum operational time of 6 seconds, which is the maximum flight time I observed with a stopwatch. I have movement speed bonus rank 8 which is +435% (I can't remember if in...

It's not rounding the same number differently, though. The actual values for quality module 3 are as follows: 2.5%, 3.25%, 4.00%, 4.75%, 6.25%. The values in the display are rounded down (technically incorrectly) to the following: 2.5%, 3.2%, 4%, 4.7%, 6.2% As for productivity module 2, the numbers...

However, for Quality Module 3 the difference in tiers is as follows: Normal to Uncommon: 0.7; Uncommon to Rare: 0.8; Rare to Epic: 0.7 This is display rounding iirc. The bonus has two digit precision but the display only has one digit precision and omits the 0.05 tail on some values. I hope everyon...

If anyone knows of a way (on this forum) to actually "hide" text, such that it doesn't "take up space" until clicked (etc) -- rather than simply being "redacted" -- Please, PLEASE tell me. If you give your spoiler tag a title, it will generate a collapsible block inste...

To add to this there is a discrepancy with the difference in quality bonus for Quality Modules themselves. I noticed this as I was doing basically the same as the OP. For a Quality Module (1) the difference in all tiers (except Legendary) is 0.3. For Quality Module 2 the difference in all tiers (exc...

[...] [edit:] In fact "spoils more slowly at higher qualities" is active voice without explicit subject. That might not be great. But again, this is not what the OP was asking to be changed. First, I need to apologize for (some of) my phrasing (last night/early this morning) in my previou...

[...] I strongly disagree with you here. None of the sentences in question mention the subject at all. The "quality" is not the subject here. The quality is not the actor. The subject in the first example would be a mining drill: > A mining drill at higher quality will deplete resources m...

First, I feel the need to say the following: the previous post was written to and submitted at (or shortly after) Midnight last night (or this morning, depending on preferences). It being so late at night/early in the morning I likely didn't type it well - or even check it before posting. That is my...

With respect to valneq's response, I feel I need to add my "two cents." Your explanation and your analogies are correct, however I believe you may be missing MinorBugReporter's point. Or, and this is entirely possible, I do not understand the origin of your explanation. Yes, you are correc...