One belt in versions 6.98 and 6.99 seems to have ore on the wrong side.

DaveMcW wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:14 pm

I removed a beacon from Flomz v2.1

Nice! Transport line performance should improve as well.

Looks good! Also some parts looks familiar :) Yeah, output belt layout was inspired by your version) Although inserter placement is changed to always interact with belt on underground input part, closer to the beginning of a transport line. Can you prep it next time? Sure, is there an instruction s...

V2.1, should be significantly faster: Managed to reduce number of separate CNs to 3 Now using a single belt and 9 furnaces 0eNrlXdtuG0mS/ZWGgH0rNfJ+MTD7sp8xMAxZot3ESpRAUd7pafjft4pF2yVWFJVxjrDbouahB6bIisrIOJFZGXFO/XXx+fZp9bBdb3YXH/66WF/fbx4vPvzzr4vH9dfN1e3w2e7Ph9XFh4v1bnV30V1sru6Gf61uV9e77fr68svTdnN1...

It seems that number of express loaders and chests considerably affects UPS (notice the difference between Stevetrov_1feed and Stevetrov_2feed). We should probably try to elimitate this factor since there are no such entities in real megabases, and creating a half-belt in a real game often doesn't h...

Welcome here! Why not put signals 0/1/2/3/4 on the same wire? My reasoning was Number of networks remains O(1) anyway, so I assume that overhead is negligible. Number of networked inserters is the same in both cases => shouldn't impact performance Yet number of wakeup calls is exactly 1 per inserte...

Was invited to post my version here, so here it is. Inserter timings calculation is described here: https://www.reddit.com/r/technicalfactorio/comments/svbupq/how_to_make_a_fully_compressed_belt_via_inserter/ 0eNrlXdtu40YS/ZVAwL7Ji76wbwNkX/IZwcCQbXqGiCwZEjXIJJh/325StjlktVWXbDCrPATBSFYXWXVOsbtONfvP1d...