+1, when inputting some 18+ complex conditions it's a little hard to do.


Honestly, i would rather the ability to type in a logic statement by hand. But something to make strong up conditions is definitely needed.


I would suggest opening a thread for this option too. That way we get more angles ...

+1, seeding/harvesting could be separated.

I want to give this my +1, was just about to make a new thread about it.

TL;DR
Make ctrl+click allow selecting multiple signals.


What?
In some circuit network builds, a need arises to select multiple signals (for listing priorities, listening/filtering/storing specific signals in different spots).
In such cases, selecting each single signal becomes tedious, in part ...

This seems to have been made possible at some point. Can this thread be moved to implemented?

Thanks!

Thanks!!

When setting a character's integration patch, it can be seen in menu simulations:
But not in game:
Example mod:

It does sound like an interesting mechanic. Overhauls could have a field day with it.

+1

This could allow for tiered progression of buildings, starting from negative qualities (which retain usefulness even in late game) and buildings with positive quality

It would be neat to be able to modify an inventory to have a custom stack size that applied globally to all of its slots.

This could come in useful when designing containers that hold smaller than normal stack sizes (mini-chests, mini-trains) that are capable of holding many different kinds of ...

I profiled the save file and found some areas to improve for the next release.


I might be missing something here but just wanted to report that I tested the same setup in 2.0.50 (180K linked chests all linked to the same inventory and 100 inserters). I think now not only the save-scrambled ...

Thanks for all your work

Thanks!!

Thanks for the swift response!

As an added question - Are these forwards tick instantaneous ?- as in, there is no delay like in circuit networks.

Also, the behavior where the setup takes 15 ms upon creation but 45 ms upon load is expected?

I was running some tests to see how UPS were affected by belts/chest/inventory size etc.

However, when I tested linked chests, they seem to take longer to process (higher ms cost and lower ups) when you have more of them linked, but disproportionately so.

05-14-2025, 18-36-24.png

In this setup ...