boskid, presumably you could just treat the two ends as a curve piece of the appropriate direction for the purposes of pathing? It would exclude any identical track of the same type from mating at that location, but that would be an acceptable compromise. Restating this idea: as long as the new piec...

I'm necroing this thread since there is still demand from those of us who love railworlds for more variety of special track pieces and the devs are looking at rail system changes for 0.18 anyway. Specifically, a tighter single-piece S-curve for making doubled track swtichovers.

You can also use an arithmetic combinator set to Each + 0 / Each as a signal diode/ one-way to keep irrelevant signals out, in fact, this is recommended, as sending unnecessary signals into a LTN station can eventually cause game performance problems with enough stations. Remeber, with LTN, use a gr...

When the timeout triggers the delivers is removed from the list. So the train would no longer be LTN controlled. And then as eduran said the blue goes away. In all my games the first thing I do is raise the default provider/requester limits and the timeouts. When I play with LTN I try to get it ear...

Are you using a stop that is both a requester and provider? Edit: It looks like station timeout knocks blue signal out as well. Edit 2: That may be my entire problem, so in increased timeout to an hour and see if that fixes. Edit 3: Yep that did it. So instead of my orignal request, which seems to b...

There is no override. Yellow: Train is on the way Blue: Train is parked at stop If I have a blue signal and a new train queue's up for that stop, the signal output changes from blue to yellow when there is a train parked at the stop. The exit from the requester/provider in question is always clear,...

Heyo! I love LTN, but certain behaviors of the LTN stop annoy me, most notably the facts that A: Yellow Signal overrides Blue signal when a train is at a provider/requester, and B: blue signal is terminated before a train leaves a provider/requester if the trains LTN schedule order has been complete...

Map preview with RSO is broken, ore patches do not display in the preview.

Arch666Angel, thank you for you reply. When you get to it, please make sure that lowering the frequency spreads out the patches more, as expected. It would also be nice if the scaling slider did the same (Scale the patches apart, but without making them larger.) I'm interested in a hardcore rail wor...

Arch666Angel , do you intend on looking at the ore spawning issues, or do you consider that outside the scope of your mod?

Can we please get a "Terrain scaling effects ore placement" switch? When I scale up the terrain, everything gets larger, but the ore patches stay in the same place. Note that I don't want the resource size to change, just the location.

I'm getting the ore spawning issue as well, the frequency slider makes the patches larger, but doesn't actually effect the frequency, nor does the scaling slider push ore patches father apart (that may be a base game issue though). Size slider doesn't effect size.

Forgive me, I thought it was a strict dep. I stand corrected.

Earendel has not yet completed the AAI 0.17 update, considering this is dependent on that, you will have to wait for the prerequisite.

Light wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 04, 2019 5:26 am

I refuse to start a new game until this mod is ready, I love it that much. The alien atmosphere this mod brings elevates the experience more than I imagined it could have. It's like C&C Tiberian Sun, which is also why I play the soundtrack alongside it.

O.O I do the exact same thing!

Yep, everything but the bio processing stuff is updated! Thanks so much to Arch666Angel for such a swift update! I hope to see Bio processing added to that list soon!

I have no idea what ZAdventure is...

Woooo! Also, I made a small mod-on-a-mod for "The Ruins" that adds some AAI stuff to spawn if anyone is interested.

mrvn, I did consider that, but I expect it will make upstream distribution more complicated.... Ugh, it's always a compromise.

Ah, well the selection tool was the bit I really cared about anyway (alongside alternate cost for producing them, but that is a truly minor point) so it should be just as good.