β¦ well β¦ strictly speaking, 1 Watt = 1 Joule / 1 Second, which is the unit of power.
I think DBotThePony was talking about the integrated power consumption over time, which is an energy measured in Joules.
β¦ well β¦ strictly speaking, 1 Watt = 1 Joule / 1 Second, which is the unit of power.
What "Total tab"?DBotThePony wrote: βFri Mar 20, 2020 3:51 amCurrently, we always see averaged power usage in watts over all possible time periods. This sometimes make sense, sometimes does not. For example - Total tab. What do these watts mean? Average usage in watts over entire time? What is entire time? And how does 5 Kilowatt lamp consumed more power over 1 hour than 7 megawatt drill consumed in 5 seconds on Total tab?
Watts are good for displaying on graphs and instantaneous power usage, but total power usage should be in joules, since we almost always want to know how much a machine consumed energy over X period of time, not it's average consumption (because some machines consume extreme amounts of power in short periods, and most of time it idle almost without any consumption)
Yes, machines show consumption in watts. It means, if machine work full power for 1 second it will consume X joules in it's tooltip. But machines tend not to work all the time, or work less than full. Great example - inserters. They work very short periods and every moment it's power consumption differ. For 5 seconds graph/statistics it is good to measure power consumption in watts (because it is very short time span), but for wider periods averaged watts start to not make sense.Deadlock989 wrote: βFri Mar 20, 2020 9:03 amWhat "Total tab"?DBotThePony wrote: βFri Mar 20, 2020 3:51 amCurrently, we always see averaged power usage in watts over all possible time periods. This sometimes make sense, sometimes does not. For example - Total tab. What do these watts mean? Average usage in watts over entire time? What is entire time? And how does 5 Kilowatt lamp consumed more power over 1 hour than 7 megawatt drill consumed in 5 seconds on Total tab?
Watts are good for displaying on graphs and instantaneous power usage, but total power usage should be in joules, since we almost always want to know how much a machine consumed energy over X period of time, not it's average consumption (because some machines consume extreme amounts of power in short periods, and most of time it idle almost without any consumption)
The "entire time" is ... the time that you selected from the big string of buttons with times on them. If you select 1 hour and the average consumption in that hour is 1 MW then you know that you consumed 3600 MJ over that hour. Whether it spikes in power or not, whether it is idle or not, is irrelevant to that. That's what average means.
Every machine shows its power consumption in watts. Everything to do with the power system is measured in watts, which are joules per second. If, for some reason, you needed to know exactly how many joules a specific network burned in a specific period, it could take you seconds on a calculator given the information provided. But that's a lump sum of power and it's a product of what's on the graph over time. It could maybe be a stat somewhere else on the GUI but it just seems like clutter that most people won't need.
Sorry but I find this confusing and weird, like we're playing two different games. The only reason I ever open the menu is to check that my power production has the ability to keep up with demand.
I don't understand what it is that you want instead. Or why, but start with what. You don't like watts for some reason. You want joules over time instead. Which is ... watts, if the time is a second, or some weird "joules per 5 hours" or whatever if it's some other period ... The graph would look exactly same whatever units you make up.
Shields? On the power network? Probably some janky mod's fault. Roboport energy spikes are completely normal. Like lots of other stuff, they have a low constant drain and then they demand a lot more power when they have to do work, i.e. charge bots.DBotThePony wrote: βFri Mar 20, 2020 11:12 amWow, here they are! Also, notice roboport energy usage spikes, and COMPLETELY constant energy shields energy consumption. And it is more than double consumption as on "Total" tab. This does not make sense.
Yes, turret shields. On power network. The problem here, "All" tab does not show us over which time period it show power consumption. And also, the fact, that turret shields were consuming exactly 234 MW of power over 10+ hours, but "All" still show them as 108 MW.
OK, if the "All" button is what you meant when you were saying "Total tab" before, I think I understand now.DBotThePony wrote: βFri Mar 20, 2020 11:40 amYes, turret shields. On power network. The problem here, "All" tab does not show us over which time period it show power consumption. And also, the fact, that turret shields were consuming exactly 234 MW of power over 10+ hours, but "All" still show them as 108 MW.
And i do like Watts. I don't like them being utilized in such way. Instead of averaging watts over time, i would like to see consumed joules instead.
I do miss the button to import blueprint strings in the blueprint menu.brunzenstein wrote: βThu Mar 19, 2020 8:07 amAfter using the new mechanics a few times I / one gets used to.Itemfinder wrote: βThu Mar 19, 2020 6:58 amI too would like the import string button back in the Blueprint menu, OR a dedicated keybind, like the rest of the blueprint library functions. The most utility I've found in the shortcut bar is checking combination keybindings, because they are more efficient to deploy. Edit: And monitoring the status of Personal Roboports/Exoskeletons which I've just recognized the utility of..brunzenstein wrote: βWed Mar 18, 2020 8:57 pmthanks - the bug was on me - I found that in my my settings to the shortcut bar the import was offpicklock wrote: βWed Mar 18, 2020 8:37 pmYou can import BP strings using "Import string" from the shortcut bar. But I would prefer the Imput string button back in the BP GUI.brunzenstein wrote: βWed Mar 18, 2020 8:03 pmI cannot import BP files anymore as the dedicated tabs / buttons are missing
I was initially very sceptic but now I love it.