Congratulation, you have successfully demonstrated how a personnal opinion isn't a valid argument beyond any example i could have brought up. You don't have to make it a personnal attack though, the demonstration is valid for everyone.Panzerknacker wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 12:17 pm There he is again, mr. wall of text opposing any balance changes to the game that would logically make the game better but would probably break his personal blueprints thus are these valid arguments disrespectfully dismissed as 'misleading', 'unclear' and similar terms that he uses when he fails to even understand what the smarter people are talking about.
Only because any change to the game would break his little way of doing things. It's not worth it to even respond to this person guys, learn from me.
Ontopic: Good suggestions in this thread, I'm sure the devs will look at them for 2.1 and I hope they will change the game massively!
Also the only design posted in here was made in anticipation of the proposed change, so it wouldn't be broken by the change, that sound particularly misguided to base your ad hominem attack on this particular point.