Don't add undergrounds when click-dragging belts across structures marked for deconstruction

[causa-sui]

As I'm sure many of us do, I am enjoying the click-drag automatic placement of undergrounds tremendously. This is a great feature!

However...

I have observed that when click-dragging a belt across deconstruction marked entities, undergrounds are placed. This is not ideal, and can be annoying when adjusting belt placement. Thanks!

[ssilk]

Hm. I can think of many ways, how to solve this problem. What is the right behavior in your opinion?

[bormand]

This is not ideal, and can be annoying when adjusting belt placement.

How? Those entities are just marked to deconstruction, you can't place belts there yet.

Ghost belts work, though. Try to press hold shift while routing the belt through the area marked for deconstruction.

[causa-sui]

Hm. I can think of many ways, how to solve this problem. What is the right behavior in your opinion?

The simplest solution that is clearly better than the status quo is: do everything the same except don't place the undergrounds. As it is, I have to remove undergrounds and fill some gaps in the belts to get the outcome I originally wanted. This way, I only fill some gaps in the belts.

If I drag a belt north to south over this deconstruction marked belt:

1_from_this.jpg (362.77 KiB) Viewed 3087 times

This is what I get:

what_i_get.jpg (377.03 KiB) Viewed 3087 times

This is what I want:

what_i_want.jpg (367.69 KiB) Viewed 3087 times

[ssilk]

Sorry, this is in my eyes not a good behavior and would end as bug-report.

(Btw: I thought at first making this suggestion to a bug-report, but it isn’t clearly a bug.)

When I can add my opinion: it would await, that in any case the belt is drawn as going through the destructed parts.

If player is in reach and enough space left: remove the items in the way automatically.
Not near enough/no space: drawn as ghost over the destructed parts.

[causa-sui]

Hard to wrap my head around why what I get is not a bug, while what I want is a bug. If it had been that way originally, you think it would get bug reports, while this doesn't?

Another option would be to place ghosts over the deconstruction marked structures.

[ssilk]

Hard to wrap my head around why what I get is not a bug, while what I want is a bug. If it had been that way originally, you think it would get bug reports, while this doesn't?

A bug is, when a program does things, that it shouldn’t, or doesn’t things, that it should.

Current behavior: not a bug. It operates, as it was planned by the devs. You draw a line of belts and it connects it. It’s not perfect, yes, but it works.

Your suggestion: player draws a line, but it leaves a gap. Not doing, what it should, unexpected behavior. Bug.

Or see it from that perspective: If I draw a line of belts and not everything is connected and you don’t see it, because of trees in the way for example, it would create very big frustration.

Another option would be to place ghosts over the deconstruction marked structures.

Yes. See my last sentence. You can do that in any case, but I found it more practical, to remove the destructed items, if you are near enough and have space left in your inventory.

[Kyralessa]

The simplest solution that is clearly better than the status quo is: do everything the same except don't place the undergrounds. As it is, I have to remove undergrounds and fill some gaps in the belts to get the outcome I originally wanted. This way, I only fill some gaps in the belts.

The simplest solution is (as others have noted) to shift-drag instead of click-drag, and you get what you're aiming for. Presumably you already have bots if you're marking items for deconstruction.

[causa-sui]

Your suggestion: player draws a line, but it leaves a gap. Not doing, what it should, unexpected behavior. Bug.

This swings on what one "expects" and it's why I don't like this definition of a bug. I expect the other behavior vs what you seem to expect. Anyway, I never suggested that this was a bug, so that is an academic discussion.

Or see it from that perspective: If I draw a line of belts and not everything is connected and you don’t see it, because of trees in the way for example, it would create very big frustration.

I would not recommend that unless the trees are marked for deconstruction.

[bormand]

Undergrounds may look ugly after deconstruction, but they are functional. Gaps aren't functional, they don't work unless you fix them later. That's why I think that current behavior is better than suggested one.

And you have a workaround: just hold shift while routing belts through the area marked for deconstruction. No gaps, no undergrounds.

Auto-switch to ghost mode while placing entities over entities marked for deconstruction looks more promising. But the placement logic is already insanely complex, I doubt that devs want to change it again and open a new can of bugs and corner cases...

[ssilk]

Your suggestion: player draws a line, but it leaves a gap. Not doing, what it should, unexpected behavior. Bug.

This swings on what one "expects" and it's why I don't like this definition of a bug. I expect the other behavior vs what you seem to expect. Anyway, I never suggested that this was a bug, so that is an academic discussion.

Ok, let me say it so: It has nothing to do, how I define a bug, if a player thinks, that something is unexpected.

Or see it from that perspective: If I draw a line of belts and not everything is connected and you don’t see it, because of trees in the way for example, it would create very big frustration.

I would not recommend that unless the trees are marked for deconstruction.

No, I mean you are routing a belt through a forest, but you have removed a path of trees already; small path, but clear. And you have overseen a small rock or piece of lake, because it was hidden by a tree.

[causa-sui]

No, I mean you are routing a belt through a forest, but you have removed a path of trees already; small path, but clear. And you have overseen a small rock or piece of lake, because it was hidden by a tree.

You should get undergrounds then, because the obstruction is not marked for deconstruction already.