Train Suborders

Post your ideas and suggestions how to improve the game.

Moderator: ickputzdirwech

Jelmergu
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 8:49 am
Contact:

Train Suborders

Post by Jelmergu »

I have a factory with a couple of trains that go to a circuit controlled unloading station. This station has to be able to take one item from each wagon to check its contents and determine if it should unload the wagon.

To achieve this, I have set my trains to leave after 5 seconds of inactivity. I resoned that if the train was empty it would not need to stay in the station and wait for the circuit to tell it to leave.

As recap needed is:
  • Always wait for 5 seconds of inactivity
  • Either leave
    • When Everything < 0 (leave when circuit says so)
    • When Empty cargo inventory
In game that results in the following
Image

The last 'AND 5 seconds of inactivity' is in my opinion a bit overkill.

What I suggest is that you can group conditions together, in this case the empty cargo and circuit can get grouped together
Something like this:
Image

Which also allows for creating conditions that say either 5 seconds of inactivity and either 1 or 2, or 60 seconds passed or something
thetoolcrafter
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 1:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Train Suborders

Post by thetoolcrafter »

This is a really good idea, I only hope this gets read by the developers :D
User avatar
Deadly-Bagel
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1498
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 10:12 am
Contact:

Re: Train Suborders

Post by Deadly-Bagel »

Hmm. How do you group conditions? Can you 'ungroup' them? What about nesting groups? For this to be implemented properly it would double the number of buttons for managing wait conditions and you have to consider that trains aren't particularly newb-friendly to start with.

I would make a counter-suggestion for indenting AND conditions. Purely a cosmetic change, but it would make it clearer that it is a 'block' that all must be true to trigger leaving the station.

On the surface your suggestions sounds good however it's only useful if you have a condition that applies identically to multiple OR blocks, but somewhat falls apart if you have two (or more) common conditions which would require nesting however that gets messy. I think this would be very rarely used due to the obscurity of it and mostly because it doesn't apply to very many situations.
Money might be the root of all evil, but ignorance is the heart.
User avatar
ssilk
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 12889
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Train Suborders

Post by ssilk »

I would call the concept "brackets". :)
Cool suggestion: Eatable MOUSE-pointers.
Have you used the Advanced Search today?
Need help, question? FAQ - Wiki - Forum help
I still like small signatures...
Yoyobuae
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 509
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Train Suborders

Post by Yoyobuae »

ssilk wrote:I would call the concept "brackets". :)
Maybe the UI should auto-bracket the conditions based on the existing operator precedence for AND, OR. The conditions are already automatically grouped (I think AND is calculated first, then OR. Or maybe it was the other way around).

Explicitly showing this grouping would help UI clarity, I think.
golfmiketango
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:48 am
Contact:

Re: Train Suborders

Post by golfmiketango »

+1 for the idea of explicitly showing the operator precedence somehow, even if the semantics were to remain the same.
Post Reply

Return to “Ideas and Suggestions”