I thought the new change of having to add an extra belt to the end of every beltway wouldn't be much of a deal, until I started using my setup. I have my machine that makes belts. I made two inserters take belts out of it and a third inserter put cogs into it. Before this wasn't a problem because the cogs would be dumped in front of it to be picked up but now when I put a belt there it connects with the output belts and ends up mixing together my belts with my cogs. I would show a picture but imgur is acting up.
It makes factories more difficult to miniaturize but I'm not sure if this change was for optimization or whatnot.
End Belts
-
ratchetfreak
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2015 12:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: End Belts
You can often turn the new belt into the inserter to avoid it fouling up other belts
Re: End Belts
Oh, that worked. Thanks for the solution!
Re: End Belts
What I've been doing is putting a single belt-to-ground at the end, inserters will still take from it and place in it, but turning the belt is much simpler 
-
Enigmatica
- Inserter
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: End Belts
This is what I've done too. It works well when you have very compact solutions and you don't want your belts mixing.jeroon wrote:What I've been doing is putting a single belt-to-ground at the end, inserters will still take from it and place in it, but turning the belt is much simpler
Re: End Belts
Well with a complex multi-belts setup, turning the belt is not always an option. This is a good alternative for those rare instances.jeroon wrote:What I've been doing is putting a single belt-to-ground at the end, inserters will still take from it and place in it, but turning the belt is much simpler
-
The Phoenixian
- Filter Inserter
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 4:31 pm
- Contact:
Re: End Belts
It is also pretty.Zhab wrote:Well with a complex multi-belts setup, turning the belt is not always an option. This is a good alternative for those rare instances.jeroon wrote:What I've been doing is putting a single belt-to-ground at the end, inserters will still take from it and place in it, but turning the belt is much simpler
The greatest gulf that we must leap is the gulf between each other's assumptions and conceptions. To argue fairly, we must reach consensus on the meanings and values of basic principles. -Thereisnosaurus
Re: End Belts
I can only think of a single situation in which turning the belt into the inserter would not work, and that is if you are using a single inserter to pick up more than three different item types from two belts coming in from opposite directions. In which case you could still solve the issue by just adding another inserter.Zhab wrote:Well with a complex multi-belts setup, turning the belt is not always an option.
Other than that there's really no issue unless you were putting stuff like electric poles in the spots where the belts need to be now.
OS: Linux Mint 19 x64 | desktop: Awesome 4.2 | Intel Core i5 8600k | 16GB DDR4 | NVidia GTX 1050 Ti (driver version: 410.104) (2019-03)
Re: End Belts
Well I can think of more situations where this is the only option. But it is bothersome to explain and I'm lazy right now. As long as people know that there is an alternative to turning belts then that is enough for me. Even if they currently think I'm crazy right now.