[Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post all other topics which do not belong to any other category.

Do you like the current battery graphics?

Poll ended at Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:23 pm

Yes, I like the current graphics
25
54%
Yes, I got used to it. But when 0.16.51 came out I didn't like it.
6
13%
No, I prefer the previous version
9
20%
No, I think a new version is needed
6
13%
 
Total votes: 46

FasterJump
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:43 am
Contact:

[Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by FasterJump »

Nine month ago, the battery graphics was changed in 0.16.51. Some people reacted to it because they didn't like the change. I would like to ask the players today: are you happy with the current battery design?

Please vote without being influenced by other people's posts. You still can change your vote later anyway.

For reference
[Poll] Battery design that stabilizes 0.16.51
User avatar
steinio
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 2638
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:19 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by steinio »

5th option missing: i don't care how it looks.
Image

Transport Belt Repair Man

View unread Posts
DerGraue
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by DerGraue »

The reason for the graphics change was not because the new one looks better.
The reason was that DURACELL would sue the shit out of WUBE if they would not change it. So the previous one will not come back.
User avatar
Ranakastrasz
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 2173
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 3:05 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by Ranakastrasz »

Eh, I still miss the sonic screwdriver repair kits, the old plastic, steel, and copper.
But eh, aside from steel vs plastic, its all pretty recognizable at a glance.

My only complaint with batteries now is they are too visually complex for their size. Small objects should be simple, but the battery isn't.
My Mods:
Modular Armor Revamp - V16
Large Chests - V16
Agent Orange - V16
Flare - V16
Easy Refineries - V16
FasterJump
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:43 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by FasterJump »

I think it's more difficult to see the batteries in a base.

Check this screenshot, can you spot the battery lane as fast as you can spot the iron/copper/... lanes?

Where are the batteries
Maybe the problem is that the batteries (and the solid fuel by the way, is it a placeholder graphics?) have roughly the same color compared to the belt color: dark grey.

But I guess everyone have different tastes.
Durentis
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:55 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by Durentis »

Even if it's true that Duracell sparked a change in the battery design, there's nothing wrong with Factorio sticking with the same simple stripe design but changing the colours. Look at Duracell and Energizer batteries side by side.. roughly the same proportions of the stripes but different colours. Other branded batteries have different stripe proportions and different colours, but nevertheless the same simplicity of coloured stripes. Maybe I'm just thick, or have not purchased disposable batteries in too long (because why?), but I never in all my time playing Factorio thought of Duracell when crafting batteries despite the colour similarities - I think their environments are just too far removed to create association/confusion.

And just receiving a notice doesn't mean it's credible and requires a change. The response to Monster from Blue Jeans Cable was amusing, for example.

There were proposed alternative colours that I much preferred when these batteries were initially changed that maintained the ease of identification on belts and would have made any outside claims against them frivolous if they weren't already.

But that said, the look of the batteries isn't really going to alter my experience much and I don't expect them to be changed back. It's still the same gameplay in that they're automatically produced, routed, and consumed while I'm running around somewhere else.
ManaUser
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 9:41 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by ManaUser »

I find it rather unlikely that Duracell would sue over this. And if anything, reinforcing that as the default depiction of a "a battery" is probably a win in their book. Other games have use the "copper-top" image too, without any problem as far as I know.

However, I personally think it's mildly undesirable to have it look so much like a real word brand, even the fact that it looked like an AA battery at all is a little bit silly. So I prefer the more generic high-tech look. If the new images don't stand out well on belts that's a legitimate criticism though.
User avatar
mrudat
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 248
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 5:21 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by mrudat »

Perhaps a nice orange coloured plastic wrapper around the battery? (with the gear logo if you zoom in really close, perhaps) Because clearly they're Factorio brand rechargeable batteries that you're making. =)
makrom
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:27 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by makrom »

Can I vote "whatever"?
I think the new graphic is good enough. Not sure why people even bothered to care about it, probably just because they can't handle change. No one ever brought up things like whether the blue PCB really looked like an advanced circuit board, or iron ore looks like raw ore etc.
makrom
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:27 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by makrom »

ManaUser wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2019 11:45 pm I find it rather unlikely that Duracell would sue over this. And if anything, reinforcing that as the default depiction of a "a battery" is probably a win in their book. Other games have use the "copper-top" image too, without any problem as far as I know.
I guess the design change was a proactive move. The problem is that Duracell might be forced to sue since you can lose any claims for designs and brands once they are considered to be generic and you are not showing the will to defend them.
DerGraue
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by DerGraue »

viewtopic.php?p=369067#p369067
posila wrote: Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:36 am So, Duracell very politely pointed out to us by an e-mail the battery design we were using is their trademark and asked us to change it. [...]
for the non believers
milo christiansen
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 7:11 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by milo christiansen »

When a company asks you nicely to change something for trademark reasons you do it. Simple as that. Better to do it voluntarily and part friends (or at least without animosity) than have to deal with legal issues. Besides, someday you may have a trademark to protect.

Why cause a fight when it is such a simple thing to change? Wube and Duracell 100% did the right things here, Duracell by asking nicely, and Wube by complying without a fuss.
User avatar
Ranakastrasz
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 2173
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 3:05 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by Ranakastrasz »

milo christiansen wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:22 pm When a company asks you nicely to change something for trademark reasons you do it. Simple as that. Better to do it voluntarily and part friends (or at least without animosity) than have to deal with legal issues. Besides, someday you may have a trademark to protect.

Why cause a fight when it is such a simple thing to change? Wube and Duracell 100% did the right things here, Duracell by asking nicely, and Wube by complying without a fuss.
Indeed. Better than the way youtube is being torn apart over copyright claims.

That doesn't change the fact that the battery isn't as instantly recognizable as it used to be. Too much complexity for the size of the object. Before it had like 3 color segments. Now, its got at least 7 or so. I can understand this for machines that probably weren't meant to be on belts most of the time, but batteries are like a basic resource.
My Mods:
Modular Armor Revamp - V16
Large Chests - V16
Agent Orange - V16
Flare - V16
Easy Refineries - V16
Hannu
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 850
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 6:27 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by Hannu »

I liked old sprite with clear shape of AA-cell. Current child's comic book battery looks general gray stuff from far away and is difficult to identify (especially in modded games). Colors would be easy to change so that they do not conflict with Duracell's trademarks.
Hannu
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 850
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 6:27 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by Hannu »

milo christiansen wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:22 pm When a company asks you nicely to change something for trademark reasons you do it. Simple as that. Better to do it voluntarily and part friends (or at least without animosity) than have to deal with legal issues. Besides, someday you may have a trademark to protect.
Of course but only coloring is Duracell's trademark. Not the shape of AA-cell. Devs could have just changed Durecell's orange color and maybe make color ring width different.
Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by Koub »

We're just basically redoing the long debate that initially occurred at the time the change was done.
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
User avatar
_Attila_
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:46 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by _Attila_ »

The fact is that batteries used to be instantly recognizable from practically any distance and now they are not (almost from any distance).
Attila's QuickBar Mod - Auto-links hand crafted item to first free quickbar slot if not already linked.
Attila's Signals Mod - Alternate signals to use in same circuit as standard signals.
Attila's Zoom Mod - Modifies zoom functionality.
Maddhawk
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat May 05, 2018 6:53 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by Maddhawk »

DerGraue wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2019 1:35 pm The reason for the graphics change was not because the new one looks better.
The reason was that DURACELL would sue the shit out of WUBE if they would not change it. So the previous one will not come back.
Proof? If anything, Duracell would probably look at it, consider a letter, and then instead opt to offer a formal image licensing agreement for product placement advertising. That said, I highly doubt any contact was had between Wube and Duracell Inc.
DerGraue
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 12:12 pm
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by DerGraue »

Maddhawk wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:14 pm
DerGraue wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2019 1:35 pm The reason for the graphics change was not because the new one looks better.
The reason was that DURACELL would sue the shit out of WUBE if they would not change it. So the previous one will not come back.
Proof? If anything, Duracell would probably look at it, consider a letter, and then instead opt to offer a formal image licensing agreement for product placement advertising. That said, I highly doubt any contact was had between Wube and Duracell Inc.
This made me laugh. Thank you for that.
It also reminded me of how useful these discussions in forums are in general. Thank you for that as well.

For proof scroll up a few posts.
Maddhawk
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat May 05, 2018 6:53 am
Contact:

Re: [Poll] Battery graphics in 0.17

Post by Maddhawk »

DerGraue wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 5:22 pm
Maddhawk wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:14 pm
DerGraue wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2019 1:35 pm The reason for the graphics change was not because the new one looks better.
The reason was that DURACELL would sue the shit out of WUBE if they would not change it. So the previous one will not come back.
Proof? If anything, Duracell would probably look at it, consider a letter, and then instead opt to offer a formal image licensing agreement for product placement advertising. That said, I highly doubt any contact was had between Wube and Duracell Inc.
This made me laugh. Thank you for that.
It also reminded me of how useful these discussions in forums are in general. Thank you for that as well.

For proof scroll up a few posts.
Ah, might want to reformat your post and place the link at the bottom of it. I had been doing just a casual skim and had missed the link several times since the color of links is the same as post titles. I know, I know, I know; no need to say it, that is on me for missing it. Still if I missed it due to skimming, and I was looking for very such a thing before posting, then others will probably miss it as well. Moving it down to the bottom of your post, after your little tit, will help better promote it for visibility.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”