Performance comparison for CPUs

Post all other topics which do not belong to any other category.
User avatar
StoneLegion
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 687
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for different computer setups

Post by StoneLegion »

Factorio Version: 0.12.24
Specs:
OS: Win 10 Home
CPU: Intel 477k
GPU: 780TI
RAM: 32gigs
Storage: SSD 500 gig evo

Average UPS: 33600 (i am listing the score without overclock, which matemathically should be around 12600)
Average FPS: 33
Screenshot:
Image
Llama
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:50 am
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for different computer setups

Post by Llama »

Factorio Version: 0.12.22
Specs:
OS: Win7 64
CPU: i5 4670k stock speeds 4x 3.4GHz
GPU: AMD 7870XT 2GB
RAM: 8GB 1600 MHz DDR3
Storage (Factorio files): 2TB HDD SATA3
OS Storage: 240GB SSD

Average UPS: 31200
Average FPS: 31.2

Virtually the same results with Chrome open or closed, also same results in openGL / D3D. Factorio seems to have its own frame limiter, removing mine still reported max 60fps ingame, or 1000+ fps via rivatuner. Didn't affect results at max speed. Only 25% CPU usage despite selecting 4 threads.

Screenshot:
facfps.png
facfps.png (477.4 KiB) Viewed 5274 times
ible
Inserter
Inserter
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:15 am
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for different computer setups

Post by ible »

Factorio Version: 0.12.24
Specs:
OS: Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit
CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1271 v3
GPU: AMD R9 280
RAM: 32GiB 1600 Mhz
Storage: 240GB SSD (Intel 730)

Average UPS: 35900
Average FPS: 36
Screenshot:
Image
User avatar
Nova
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 960
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:13 am
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for different computer setups

Post by Nova »

UPS: 30,000
FPS: 30 (only because of the huge UPS. In normal gameplay I always have 60 FPS, even with 3x3 supersampling.)

Factorio Version: 0.12.24
Specs:
OS: Win 7
CPU: Intel Core i5-4590 (3.30GHz)
GPU: GTX 660 TI
RAM: Don't know, either 1366 or 1600 MHz DDR3
Storage: SAMSUNG SSD 830
Attachments
Max UPS Factorio
Max UPS Factorio
UPS.png (587.56 KiB) Viewed 5248 times
Gammro
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 361
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for different computer setups

Post by Gammro »

Just built my new PC so I can test the steam version:
CPU: Intel i5-6500(running stock 3,2GHz with 3,6GHz Turbo)
RAM: 16GB DDR4-2133
GPU: Asus STRIX-GTX970-DC2OC-4GD5

UPS: ~28000
FPS: 28-29

Image
Ignore this
Hexicube
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for different computer setups

Post by Hexicube »

Version: 12.20

Specs:
OS: Win 7 Premium
CPU: i5-3570 (Ivy Bridge) @ 3.4GHz
GPU: GTX 970
RAM: 2x8GB DDR3 @ 2200MHz
Storage: 500GB SSD (Samsung 850 EVO)

Result:
UPS: ~23400
FPS: ~23.4

PC needs to be re-installed at some point, been meaning to migrate my installation onto the aforementioned SSD the game was on (currently got a smaller SSD for "important" steam games and windows itself and a main HDD for data which will get removed).

I also rounded my UPS to nearest hundred. It was 23434.34, which considering the FPS result is incredibly weird.
Koub
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 7938
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 8:54 am
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for different computer setups

Post by Koub »

Hexicube wrote:I also rounded my UPS to nearest hundred. It was 23434.34, which considering the FPS result is incredibly weird.
If you have a look at all the previous posts on this topic, that's the typical ratio we all get : 1k UPF
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
User avatar
Alekthefirst
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 7:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for different computer setups

Post by Alekthefirst »

I thouygt this thread was dead by now, then i come home from far away (4 days) and see poeple posting in it.
What we are realy doing here is finding out which CPU runs factorio better, but the test i decided on just measures pure CPU integer performance, charts for that can be found elsewhere. As Kovarex stated previously, and as i have decided to believe in, performance in larger bases is what really matters, and i do not believe testing UPS on small saves is the way to go, hence i am asking any mod that wants to, to lock this thread
Factorio is a game about automating everything. One day, i hope i can automate shitty signatures just like this one.
User avatar
Kayanor
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 566
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 7:20 am
Contact:

Re: Performance comparison for CPUs

Post by Kayanor »

Locked on request by OP.
Former moderator
Locked

Return to “General discussion”