[boskid] Objects on top of asteroid collector

[PastaEngineer]

Able to place a big power poles, gates, and landmines on top of an asteroid collector. I tried quite a few objects (not all) and found it strange these were able to be placed.

[boskid]

That was already fixed for 2.0.13 as part of 118506.

[PastaEngineer]

That was already fixed for 2.0.13 as part of 118506.

My post precedes that linked one by 2 days.

[boskid]

My post precedes that linked one by 2 days.

That changes nothing, when fixing bugs i am following my own ordering and i am not disallowed from fixing one bug without first browing entire forum to find if there are earlier topics with the same or similar bug. I was fixing the big electric pole collisions, when doing the changes i found 7 other entities (heat-pipe, agri tower, gate, oil refinery, land mine, tesla turret and cargo-pod-container) and fixed them all as well, and only after release i found this bug report.

[PastaEngineer]

My post precedes that linked one by 2 days.

That changes nothing, when fixing bugs i am following my own ordering and i am not disallowed from fixing one bug without first browing entire forum to find if there are earlier topics with the same or similar bug. I was fixing the big electric pole collisions, when doing the changes i found 7 other entities (heat-pipe, agri tower, gate, oil refinery, land mine, tesla turret and cargo-pod-container) and fixed them all as well, and only after release i found this bug report.

You say "That was already fixed" and link a duplicate issue which I take as insinuation that I'm being unhelpful. So I point out for clarity that mine is an older report, I ought to defend myself a little, right? Really does not warrant such a snarky and snide response. I regret ever trying to join these forums in the first place.

[boskid]

I think i handled your bug report slightly unprofessionally. I am really grateful for your bug report, i was still verifying if the fix i did was applied to gates so they collide with asteroid collectors and i am not blaming you for posting a duplicate, from the time frame point of view obviously you were unable to avoid posting duplicate since your topic was earlier and because of that i am not enforcing anything negative. I am just solving bug reports in the order they appear in my bug fixing queue and it happened that the newer bug report was handled first. I must have incorrectly read your defense as an offense that was asking for an attribution, i just felt like i did something wrong for linking the other topic in the changelog even when your report was posted earlier but that could be seen as slightly too attacky for which i want to apologize. I had no bad intentions, i am just under severe pressure caused by 15 pages of bug reports that are to be handled, sometimes i just have to move topics around to separate earth from the chaff and topics which are already fixed by the time i see them for the first time simply have to be moved to duplicates.