I don't see where the FFF mentions the capability to connect circuit wires to pipes to read the fill level? I guess you'd have to abuse storage tanks for this still?Koub wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2024 12:11 pm[Koub] Implemented in 2.0 yay \o/ :
https://factorio.com/blog/post/fff-416
Reading fluid levels of pipes, liquids shouldn't behave according to the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics
Moderator: ickputzdirwech
- BrainGamer_
- Long Handed Inserter
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2021 9:52 pm
- Contact:
Re: Reading fluid levels of pipes, liquids shouldn't behave according to the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics
Re: Reading fluid levels of pipes, liquids shouldn't behave according to the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics
My reasoning was that with the way pipes and tanks will be merged into segments, the issue described by OP should disappear, Am I wrong ?
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
- BrainGamer_
- Long Handed Inserter
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2021 9:52 pm
- Contact:
Re: Reading fluid levels of pipes, liquids shouldn't behave according to the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics
The issue described by the initial OP probably disappears yeah, but the other merged suggestion is not really. Being able to connect wires to a tank that will now output the contents of the entire segment vs directly connecting to a pipe which would now output the same is not identical imo (+ the later request to also be able to read the fluids temperature).
Re: Reading fluid levels of pipes, liquids shouldn't behave according to the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics
Indeed, but by reading the level of a tank, I can infer the level of any pipe on the same segment, as all the segment's elements will always be kept at the same level.BrainGamer_ wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 3:37 pmBeing able to connect wires to a tank that will now output the contents of the entire segment vs directly connecting to a pipe which would now output the same is not identical imo (+ the later request to also be able to read the fluids temperature).
With current numbers :
- a tank at 25k means all the pipes in the same segment are at 100
- a tank at 12.5k means all the pipes in the same segment are at 50
- a tank at 10k means all the pipes in the same segment are at 10/25x100=40
I think what we need is to measure how full a segment is.
Concerning the temperature, I agree that won't help, but I'd rather have it in a dedicated thread. BTW there are already quite a few suggestions for similar things, like temperature sensors for heat pipes, heat exchangers,...
Koub - Please consider English is not my native language.
Re: Reading fluid levels of pipes, liquids shouldn't behave according to the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics
> I think what we need is to measure how full a segment is.
Any update on this, in particular reading pipes? This would help immensely with meta-automating fluids. Adding a fluid tank to segments is usually extremely undesirable because it enormously increases their volume, and this effectively kills machine fill rate since the system becomes practically empty.
Meta-automating solids doesn't have this issue as every entity in their network can be read, and this asymmetry makes things really inelegant.
EDIT: Since I realized this topic is in 'implemented', created a dedicated thread: viewtopic.php?t=118101
Any update on this, in particular reading pipes? This would help immensely with meta-automating fluids. Adding a fluid tank to segments is usually extremely undesirable because it enormously increases their volume, and this effectively kills machine fill rate since the system becomes practically empty.
Meta-automating solids doesn't have this issue as every entity in their network can be read, and this asymmetry makes things really inelegant.
EDIT: Since I realized this topic is in 'implemented', created a dedicated thread: viewtopic.php?t=118101
Last edited by zig1000 on Fri Oct 25, 2024 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.