- the power output is very unstable +-30% so it requires a thing that limits the power it can output in order to give constant power, i used some fast discharge accumulators but that had a disadvantage : it means that fusion power is treated as tertiary ,there was a transformer mod out there but if i remember well it was UPS heavy so i avoided it
- beacuse of the prev point it is very advisable not to selfpower the setup , a small perpetual power setup would be enough since power usage is not large
- dont use PA to get anything used for fusion ingredients , since py has been making PA more expensive it is very likely to bring the power to the negative side
Fusion probably should be built in 2 types of configurations: 1-2-3k setup and antimatter setup there is also the 1-2-3-4k setup BUT that one is either MASSIVE or it needs to have a heavy power limitation set for the 4k part of it , also 4k fusion requires purple science to run so it is expensive
1 the 1-2-3k setup is a 3/4/1 reactor setup in this order for 100% efficiency OR with the use of speed modules can be brought up to a 1/1/1 either way a setup like this produces a constant 10.5-11.5GW , until pyAL is out i wont comment on the cost
2 since antimatter is not tied to another fusion recipe it can be scaled based on reactor count , the power per reactor will depend on the module setup , compared the the 1-2-3k setup the items required to run it are much more complex but the power is also greater NOTE: this recipe requires pyHT
regarding the 1-2-3-4k setup in order to get a perfect ratio one would need a large setup and the power produced by it would be at around a theoretical 118GW , if one would use PA to get H+ protons one can build a smaller setup BUT that would mean a very high running power cost and imply a power loop and that loop will cut a lot from the power profit margin and be very risky since this type of setup is unstable without precise power management and some decent buffers