I don't believe that the script supports a "see below" link (and I'm not sure if I really want such a listing for aesthetics reasons...?). I've just posted them under the MC Expanded header.
Thanx Avona for the original design!
Code: Select all
RHT Variant
Score: Avg. S1. S2. S3
Run1 102.15 105.93 105.66 94.86
Run2 102.06 104.26 103.73 98.20
Run4 103.57 108.80 103.86 98.06
Run3 101.37 104.80 104.33 95.00
LHT Variant
Score: Avg. S1. S2. S3.
Run1 103.06 106.20 104.8 98.20
Run2 104.06 106.06 106.06 100.06
Run3 103.32 108.86 105.66 95.46
Run4 102.44 106.66 103.06 97.60
I am absolutely fine with adaptations of all of my intersections. When I have adapted others' intersections (generally for LHT) I just put "Designed by [insert person here]. Adapted for LHT by Avona." or something similar. Great job adapting it! I wasn't sure that there was an interest for it or I would have done it myself
No rush testing it on my behalf, it's in the ballpark of the original so god enough for me
But yes, a sanity check would be great^^Signaling is probably "ok", I mean it works. But maybe an extra TMP or two can be gained by an experienced rail wizard moving/adding/removing some of the Christmas lights.
Well not really... LHT really trips my brain for some reason, but I made one anyway, keep the old noggin alive, right..
I did look over the signals and found a couple of possible changes but thought they would make little difference. I tested the intersections without signal changes.
Code: Select all
Set 1 76
Set 2 64
Set 3 57
-----
Score 66
Code: Select all
Set 1 74
Set 2 57
Set 3 53
-----
Score 62
I've posted your intersection, however my results were each 3 lower. I'm guessing that it's because I put safe exit blocks on it, which I believe are needed.warbaque wrote: ↑Thu Aug 25, 2022 7:15 pmResults if just built on top of old intersection:Code: Select all
Set 1 76 Set 2 64 Set 3 57 ----- Score 66
Code: Select all
Set 1 74 Set 2 57 Set 3 53 ----- Score 62
Are they? Each exit already has room for 1 train from each direction, without blocking.I'm guessing that it's because I put safe exit blocks on it, which I believe are needed.
Hey man
I, too, was shocked to discover that this is not true. It comes up occasionally on Discord. Apparently a lot of folks have been contributing intersections without that trait for a while now, and the years I was gone from Factorio led me to miss that trend.hansjoachim wrote: ↑Wed Sep 28, 2022 6:55 pmit doesn't fit the forum as all intersections on here allow every lane to go in every direction.
Which intersections lacks that?sparr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:57 pmI, too, was shocked to discover that this is not true. It comes up occasionally on Discord. Apparently a lot of folks have been contributing intersections without that trait for a while now, and the years I was gone from Factorio led me to miss that trend.hansjoachim wrote: ↑Wed Sep 28, 2022 6:55 pmit doesn't fit the forum as all intersections on here allow every lane to go in every direction.
That's still all directions though (aside from turning backwards) , just lacking the ability to swap between lanes.
