Just THANK YOU!!!

Thank you to keep the research queue in game!
Thank you for implementing the upgrade planner!
Thank you for implementing Copy & Paste!

Just love you guys

I think I have never seen a single discussion here that ended to something like 110 Pro vs 2 Cons here yet ^^

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!! Well, I agree that there should be a popup about a finished research so you keep track of what happened, but the queue itself is a so much needed feature: The typical process is, you sit in front of the research tree, think about your priorities, and see „ok, I need X techno...

A standard PC nowadays should AT LEAST be the following: - 8 GB RAM DDR3-2400 - 4Core CPU (at least i3-8100 / 4 x 3,6 Ghz) - 256GB SSD - 400W Power Supply You find such PCs starting at 500-600€ roughly. If the PC is any lower then any of these stats, it looses A LOT of power, if you go beyond these ...

What about simply having 2 different recipes for the satellite: a) the old one needs a lot of ressources, but is „clean“ with solar energy b) an alternative nuclear version could me much cheaper in the amount of ressources, but require expensive U238 Especially in bases that focus on mass-production...

I think its fine like it actually is. Its a good thing that you can make bad ... or rather less efficient ... choices in the game. Its good that you really want to have the higher oil researches as soon as possible, its one of those little details that really pushes you to get blue science automated...

+1

Especially when using mods and Beacons, its annoying to calculate
Also, a mode that shows items per second (both produced and consumed) would be incredible

Koub wrote:How about a research interface that works like Galactic Civilization II's ?

Spoiler

2018-04-14 07_53_37-GalCiv2 v2.20 Twilight of the Arnor research panel.jpg

ARGH, MY EYES !!!

I now own the games for roughly 3 years, and its genious creativity is worth more the any of the „premium games“ I have bought in the same time. I‘m following the friday facts since #50 or so, and the devs have always been very honest and straight-forward in everything they said. I wish more people ...

+1

Smelting at the ore site is rather inefficient appart from VERY early game. Miner -> smelter -> factory In mid-game, you carry the raw ore to the smelter setup, simply because its too much effort to build both smelting and mining at every new ore-field. You rather build a big smelting setup and carr...

Regarding trains: Well, in general a train system works great for incomming ores. depending on the size of the deposit, you simply need more or bigger trains, or more efficient stations - telling a specific number of trains is nonsense anyways, bevause it differs with the distance, the deposit size ...

Some of your information is simply outdated: - For example, with the actual version of factorio, the corners should work without reducing the throughput of a belt. So no need to use a red corner in a yellow belt. - The usage of underground belts might no longer influence the compression - at least t...

Well, what happens in reality, if you have for example waterpipes conterminated with oil or acid? It would be an extremely expensive proccess to clean them up again. A good implementation of a cleaning proccess could be a special cleaning-liquid. 1unit of this liquid neutralizes 1unit of a different...

I simply tend to avoid bidirectional trains completely, as unidirectional trains are easier to operate in high numbers. My favorite is actually 2-4 with nuclear fuel for really crazy speed and throughput. Bidirectional is also always slower (2-4 is much faster then 2-4-2, due to the weight of the un...

Does anyone know a way to include a NOT logic into the inserters filter? like to grab anything that is not iron? Sure, you can do it the other way, and grab any iron of a belt, but on belts that can have very mixed stuff on them, its a pain to make sure to have inserters for any single item that cou...

Sounds quite good - especially the stacksize of the base-game bullets is rather annoying. The 20 you suggest sounds about right.

What I‘m wondering about is, if its possible to give ammo a shooting speed bonus, so you can offer 2 different ammotypes: Highdamage low rate, and highrate lowdamage.

And one more little bit of information: Those inserters who place stuff on a belt will always only put stuff on the opposite side of the belt, never on the closer side. With inserters who grabstuff from the belt, its differently. They prefer to take stuff from the opposite side, but will start to ta...

Especially in very end-game, the number of belts quickly escalates to stupid amounts, and balancing anything beyond 8in8 is simply annoying. A couple of researches should be added at the point where rockets are already flying: - Loaders with filters - Simple Warehouses (Big chests with a footprint o...

One way to nerf bots would be, to give a bot a „loading and unloading time“ on a chest of lets say 1s, and only after he is finished loading, the next bot can come ... that way, the throughput of chests can be limited easily, and more bots wouldn‘t increase the throughput of a simple chest to chest ...