Moja znajomość języka angielskiego, jest słaba, więc nie będę się produkował, ani ośmieszał, próbując go używać. Na wstępie więc, chciałbym prosić kogoś, kto zna w/w język, żeby przetłumaczył mój post. <Polish> Sorki, ale chyba ośmieszyłeś się jeszcze bardziej, próbując pisać po polsku na międzynar...

I would allow circuit conditions to be skipping conditions BUT it would be based on signals at the current station. Somebody would ask what would be use of this but I dare to state that this would be the most powerful of all skipping conditions. Circuit network is named that not without a reason. We...

That's not true, in my base, it's the train that knows what it needs, not the station. Example: I have train that goes to about six supply stations before returning to a factory outpost. This train sets out as soon as any of the supplies run out, but it could skip all other stations. However, each ...

This idea would work very well with that one: Ghost building ☸

What I would find much more useful is a signpost that I can place besides the belts. You will find a lot of signpost suggestions... And what you really need is some kind of half-automatic placing of such signposts. Example: Place post near belt. Click edit text, click on the be belt, text is create...

Slayn25 wrote:I say the train should derail, explode, and then the aliens steal yours resources. Welcome to Dark Souls - Factorio.

Yeah, and you have only one life. If you die, your saves are deleted.

I can feel your pain, but this approach would be pretty much useless with multiplayer. There is no chance that each player would decide to stop moving mouse in the same moment. That would end as an 1-minute countdown to autosave, which is actually a good idea except that a 10 seconds would do. (Ther...

I would suggest having trains bump objects to the side with a minor loss of speed. If the entity cannot be moved to the side (due to collision with another entity) it should try to push it forward instead, then collide with it again and re-apply the damage and speed loss, repeating until the entity...

I would suggest having trains bump objects to the side with a minor loss of speed. If the entity cannot be moved to the side (due to collision with another entity) it should try to push it forward instead, then collide with it again and re-apply the damage and speed loss, repeating until the entity...

I 100% agree. I am in this situation surprisingly often.

Looking at other threads: disable personal robots, disable trash slots, disable exoskeleton, ...
I can see a pattern. It looks like we need a brand-new UI mechanic

(EDIT: stupid autocorrect)

short version: map transfer now is not very smart: in case of a new player connecting or desync: whole map is transferred solution: -client already has parts of map information (earlier save or desynced partially wrong info) -identify correct info and transfer only what is needed I don't really kno...

- Vehicles are designed to be operated manually and i think it should stay that way, however i wouldn't say no to combat robots. I absolutely disagree. When evolution factor is over 0.9 and I am destroying a big group of spawners, I have to be very careful to not drain my whole shield. There can be...

short version: map transfer now is not very smart: in case of a new player connecting or desync: whole map is transferred solution: -client already has parts of map information (earlier save or desynced partially wrong info) -identify correct info and transfer only what is needed I don't really kno...

There are a few instances which make this a bad idea. Factories with fluids: currently, all factories which have more than one fluid input, or output have them hard wired to a specific pipe, if you flip this, the pipes will be swapped around. This is probably okay if your blueprint only had that fa...

Robots also tends to gather around defense systems that often require repair. Your change could be a disadvantage for at least some play styles, because you would have to place robots manually in specific roboports to ensure quick reaction to damages.

Let's start with a little story: (tl dr - just skip this paragraph) I just ended battle with a bunch of biters. A few of my buildings was damaged but of course I was too lazy to repair them by myself. I didn't have any stationary roboports jet but I used personal roboports a lot. The roboports were ...

Guns and ammo could be optional on map-creation screen. That would solve the problem for everyone.

Problem still exists in Factorio 14.19.

I agree that control settings should not be synchronized. Why do we need a function that does not work and only breaks key binding?

I don't think it would be as much processing time. The process would be slow, so it don't need to be calculated every tick. I think that one update per 15 seconds would be enough. In this case 1/900 of all buildings would be calculating in every tick. This is nothing, compared to transport belts or ...

This could even be helpful gameplay-wise:
1) As visual indicator, how long ago something was placed/removed.
2) During modifying factory, to see where buildings were before.