Buffing the spidertron's speed into oblivion takes away that choice. Strawman. No one wants buffs to oblivion. Get out. But you want the only big disadvantage of the spidertron compared to the player, car and tank to be removed, so it becomes better in any regard. That's was my point and it still s...

I'm quite surprised that nobody mentioned yet that the spidertron can walk over islands, cliffs, the base, trees etc. without any collisions and only minor speed penalty, which is a huge advantage over ALL other free transportation options. How many time have you died pushing biters bc you hit a tre...

the 4 modules inside the assembler also contribute to the count, therefore NaB

You're supposed to provide a savefile, logfile... .
Otherwise, how is anybody able to do an analysis?

Hello, Over the last few months I have been developing a notes-creator tool to display notes (including icons) in a decently customizable way with integrated hotkey-support for LiveSplit. The focus was on Factorio speedruns but it could be used for anything else as well. I have a copyright questions...

Is your game running at the standard 60 UPS?
The playtime of your save is measured in ingame time while the playtime in steam is measured in real-time.
So if your game were to run at only 30 UPS, the playtime of your save would only advance by half the time that you played in real-time.

But if you extend this further, personal bots could switch to a normal network or even to another player's personal roboport.

Awesome, thanks!!

I just checked the behavior in 1.1.35:
The reported bug is fixed but the cancel bug is still in the game.
Also, upgrading a pair of ug-belt by only selecting one of them doesn't work at all in editor mode (is this intentional or new report?).

@kovarex Just to clarify: is the current cancle upgrade behavior intended or not?
In the above mentioned bugreports it was always marked a 'works as intended' but you just said it was unintended/bug.
I'd be glad to file this as a new bugreport.

Just curious: Was only the additional-upgrade-bug fixed or was the 'cancel-bug/feature/inconsistency/however you want to call it' changed as well?

I'm really interested what the answer will be here as there is a similar behavior when deleting the upgrade on only one of the sides. One side will be upgraded, the other one stays and they are disconnected. There were bugreports about that ( 96480 , 95772 , 70011 ) which were flagged as 'works as i...

When testing new designs in editor mode, I often need to run them over a longer time to detect minor flaws that could only be recognized after 10 or more minutes (eg. consumption is more than the input but only ever so slightly so the belt buffer is enough for some time, complex belt balancing is no...

may be related to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=97132 where he talks about the deconstruction planer over the tracked achievements.
Sounds like the 'mouse up' event of the overlay overrides the 'mouse up' event of the held item.

There are some weird behaviors when holding down movement keys while tabbing out and tabbing back in (eg. mouse clicking out and back in while in inventory). However, I wouldn't consider those to be bugs but that maybe related in some way.

When placing an underground over other belts without using the smart drag feature, it only replaces straight belts going in the same direction which are not connected to anything else.
I would expect the smart belt dragging to behave the same .

+1 There are 3 distinct states of furnaces: 1) working, 2) full output, 3) empty input. With the old behavior, one could differentiate between them without opening their Gui or hovering over them: 1) fire and item display 2) no dire but item display 3) no fire and no item display Especially when de...

+1

+1 There are 3 distinct states of furnaces: 1) working, 2) full output, 3) empty input. With the old behavior, one could differentiate between them without opening their Gui or hovering over them: 1) fire and item display 2) no dire but item display 3) no fire and no item display Especially when dea...

To be fair, that image doesn't look like vanilla...