Error while running event level::on_tick (ID 0)
__base__/lualib/compi.lua:97: bad argument #1 to 'pairs' (table expected, got nil)
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'pairs'
__base__/lualib/compi.lua:97: in function 'stand_next_to'
__base__/lualib/npe/helper-branches.lua:683: in function 'init ...

As for the ghost cursor stuff, I don't really like having it disabled by default.
You already know theres gonna be 100 million people who will never realise that its an option.

I think it would be a good idea to turn it on automatically when you unlock construction robots, and give a quick popup ...

Bug? Looking at the top row, 2nd from the left, it has the Red network wire connecting to the terminal that has a green "internal" wire attached, and vice versa for the other pole.

https://us1.factorio.com/assets/img/blog/fff-210-ccm-04b-new-belt-frames.png

Horizontal wires bends due to ...

Fuegas wrote:When you upgrade your belts from yellow to red (for example) and a splitter is halfway, would that splitter be replaced with a single red belt? Currently you can upgrade just the belts and replace the splitters later without the need to be cautious around splitters.

This.

Hi, the idea is not dead, but currently is not planned to be part of 1.0.

So, do you plan to update the game after 1.0? Or is it going to be a DLC. TBH I don't mind paying for a DLC, if it is as polished as the main game is. But it just feels weird that you are working on other albeit great ideas ...

oh you mean the FF 74 where they said " I would just like to repeat that this is still in the planning phase"

trying to hold them to the ideas they AMAZINGLY share with the community is asinine.

What I'm saying is that there is no endgame currently. I would be okay with another idea, too. It's ...

I am sure I am not the only one who was extremely excited about having a proper endgame. Launching rockets into orbit and building a space station. Maybe even traveling to other planets. But was this idea completely scraped? Are we left with just another placeholder of an endgame? Will this be how ...

Okay my first conclusion is... make the Reactors 6x6 and with 2 heat connections on each side, like so:

Nuclear Power 1.png

Allows for much better patterns when placing the Nuclear Reactors next to one another. Also allows for two 2x3 Boilers on each reactor side.


5x5 is really bad when ...

I haven't played Factorio in a while, and now when I start it I get the following error.
EDIT: Turns out that some mods were downloaded from playing multiplayer and one of them had a problem. Just deleted it and that fixed the problem.

The new train graphics are amazing!!!

HammerPiano wrote:Me when I saw that no 0.13 for today
http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/
But the train graphics are awesome!
Take your time, and make this game even more wonderful

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFI ... rUWvuiQnzZ

Tory fell on the 24th of April (a.k.a. 4.24).

The post was really interesting, even though I didn't manage to follow everything (although that might have been caused by the fact that I read it at 3am).

Smarty wrote:Seems like this problem has been resolved?

Yes, it has. Sorry if I was not clear enough.

Since this is my first post on this forum - this game is so great. And the new signal placement indicators will help alot.

Now that thats out of the way, I would like to join the players petitioning to keep "illegal" signal placement. It lets you create sections of track that can only be manually ...

The save didn't load in 0.12.30, but it did load in 0.11.22.

0.000 2016-04-09 19:07:23; Factorio 0.12.30 (Build 17998, win64, alpha)
0.000 Operating system: Windows 7 Service Pack 1
0.000 Program arguments: "D:\Games\Factorio\bin\x64\Factorio.exe" "--wait-to-close" "8080"
0.000 Read data path ...

kovarex wrote:Hello, but I don't see the link to the save game. Without the savegame, I can't obviously try it and see what is happening.

I must have forgotten to attach it, anyway here is the savegame: I also tested it on a different PC and the same thing happens.

Loewchen wrote:

indjev99 wrote:I described the issue in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=23069

No you did not.

Oops, linked the wrong thread.

Sure

Xterminator wrote:This is pretty cool actually. I feel like it would take forever to actually play a game this way, but still cool idea nonetheless. :p

Meh, a game of chess already takes forever.

I described the issue in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=49&t=23097