Search found 4 matches
- Wed Jun 24, 2026 8:20 am
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [Rseding91] [2.0.28] underground belt can be reproduced by upgrade planner and construction bot
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1904
Re: [Rseding91] [2.0.28] underground belt can be reproduced by upgrade planner and construction bot
I am 90% sure I encountered this on the newest experimental branch. Either by downgrading from turbo to express, or when I upgrades them back to turbo. Some where probably ghost entities during downgrading and upgrading.
- Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:12 pm
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [0.17.9] Non-recoverable error in scenario
- Replies: 28
- Views: 21087
Re: [0.17.9] Non-recoverable error in scenario
Yup, same here.
The scenario level caused a non-recoverable error.
Please report this error to the scenario author.
Error while running event level::on_tick (ID 0)
__base__/lualib/compi.lua:97: bad argument #1 to 'pairs' (table expected, got nil)
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'pairs'
__base ...
The scenario level caused a non-recoverable error.
Please report this error to the scenario author.
Error while running event level::on_tick (ID 0)
__base__/lualib/compi.lua:97: bad argument #1 to 'pairs' (table expected, got nil)
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'pairs'
__base ...
- Fri Mar 01, 2019 1:25 pm
- Forum: Wiki Talk
- Topic: Updates to Wiki for 0.17
- Replies: 15
- Views: 11180
Re: Updates to Wiki for 0.17
I tried being funny, the fact that the wiki is usable within hours of an experimental update is awesome!
- Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:31 pm
- Forum: Wiki Talk
- Topic: Updates to Wiki for 0.17
- Replies: 15
- Views: 11180
Re: Updates to Wiki for 0.17
The belt speeds are for 0.16.
10/10 would not automate wiki again?
/s
10/10 would not automate wiki again?