Hi,

I'm looking for a mod that provide additional information about blueprints content.
Like: maximum electrical consumption, ideal production, production/W, production/m² ...

https://i.ibb.co/jwzvLfs/Untitled.png

Do you know any mode doing something similar? (I found nothing like that in the ...

I understand why you want smarter biters, but I'm not sure this would be fun.
A very smart biters swarm could target strategic electric poles or intentionally block trains to destroy them, which can make the game very frustrating. This is not the kind of difficulty the game want to offer.

Thank you for the answers.


Hey, I ran a profiler against your save just for fun.


What is this profiler? Can I test it by myself?


Half of the time spent in the circuit network things is related to circuit controlled gates.


Is it normal? Why this circuit eat so much the UPS? Maybe this ...

Hi,

I'm the one who play with him, here is my computer :

Processor : INTEL Core i5 4690 - 6Mo - HD Graphics 4600 - LGA1150 - 0,022µ - BOX
Graphic Card : MSI GeFORCE GTX 970 Gaming 4G - 4Go GDDR5 - PCIe 3.0 x16 - 3xmini-DP, DVI (HDCP), mini-HDMI
SSD : SAMSUNG Serie 860 EVO.

I'm around 45 FPS/UPS ...

This is, in my opinion, a very annoying limitation and should be fixed. Plus, this is inconsistent with the inserter behaviours which works fine in the same situation.

I created a suggestion post here: /viewtopic.php?f=6&t=68089

TL;DR
Improve the current upgrade planner to allow the action "no module" -> "a specific module"

What ?

As discussed in this topic , it could be very useful to have the possibility to add a module from scratch with an upgrade planner.

The only 2 ways to do it in the vanilla game is:
- put ...

anyway you will soon be struggling to keep up with the biters when you stick to gun turrets only.


I prefer gun turrets and have never felt this kind of struggling, except when I have been lazy and gave advance to enemies by neglecting the development of defense. But I certainly except that ...

I agree, I had the same issue recently. In my opinion blueprint deletion should be an explicite action of the user, even if not named.

I agree with MoleOnDope, too complicated for saving only 180 ammo.

And a "pause" icon could be better than the current cross.

Something like this :

I agree, visual feedback is important to make it clear that the progression is not lost.

It is intended that they are unlocked as the game progresses, and the relevant technologies are researched


I started a new game in 0.17 with a friend (I host it). His shortcut are unlocked but not mine.
Do you have an idea why? I can provide more information if needed for debug.

I also think ...