Zavian wrote:I think it would work without the circuits.

Nope. If the loop is active when there are only two full inputs, the balancer pulls twice as much from one input as the other. I have tested it.

You say that it's impossible to build a perfect 3-1 balancer that will still balance its inputs evenly, even if some of them are missing. It's not, at least not if you allow a little bit of circuit network. Here's how:

Build a standard 4-to-1 pyramid. Hook the unused output back into the unused ...

I have created what I call "A compilation of research and occasionally a useful guide" on the designing of belt balancers, as this is a complex topic that I have recently been doing a lot of research into, and there seems to currently be a dearth of guides available. There are plenty of copy-and ...