I need constant combinator that can give one value by index signal, like an array.
Please.

Silari wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 04, 2023 1:09 am

Previous versions can't load files from later versions, and that includes the achievement list. That is intended and that's how it's working.

One could argue about that. Forward compatibility is not a rocket science in software development.

I'm with team "inertia physics for thrusters". It should't be very difficult to make the acceleration proportional to the thruster power. But of course, that bring the problem of deceleration: how do you ensure that you stop platform at the right place? Maybe make the engines "stock ...

Qon wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 08, 2023 10:17 am

Same picture again, now with comments:

Could you share more details how memory cells and access are implemented? Or at least a BP?

mmmPI wrote: ↑

Fri Oct 06, 2023 9:51 pm

coppercoil wrote: ↑

Fri Oct 06, 2023 8:15 pm

Good. How about light and smooth shadows?

Challenge accepted !

No, shadows should lie on the ground
With the distance, every shadow becomes blurry because the Sun is not a point light source.

Mango wrote: ↑

Fri Oct 06, 2023 8:13 pm

Yes - Power poles

Good. How about light and smooth shadows?

Not sure if wires should drop shadows. Have you ever seen electric wire shadow in the daytime?

am several hours into the game and just now noticing that there are no oil patches on the map. It is possible that oil patches exist, just in an unusual distance. Make a little cheat: enter edit mode in the console (in a separate game save to not ruin achievements) and look around in surroundings y...

fishforfuture wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:01 pm

Yeah, and not having wood as an ingredient for the rail recipe?!?

I thought these are golden ones. Expected for gold ore

Kinda little bit sad for me personally. I see intersection intricacies as part of fun. Making it easier takes some part of game from me. Graphics is awesome nevertheless I guess, there will be various "schools" among the players, like "no delivery bots", "no beacons", ...

Can't wait to start making railway pr0n

Svip wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 28, 2023 6:09 am

Removing the ballast because there is concrete underneath would hardly be realistic.

The concrete is absolutely realistic.
Of course, this is expensive and this is used only where needed, or if... railway owner is too rich

The angles from the circular track are very close to 22.5° which is good for making circles look round and even given that 5²+12²=13². Actually, 1:2 slope ratio is the only clever solution in the game because it matches how we build sloped walls and other buildings. I just wanted players to not say...

pointa2b wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:30 am

Q1-Q5

+1

TheRaph wrote: ↑

Sun Sep 24, 2023 11:17 am

yellow = 22.5°-angel (wider than high)

BTW arctan(0.5) = 26.6°, not 22.5°

May I ask for very large radius rail curves, for aesthetic purposes? They look more natural. Also, current curves might require significant train slowdown, so large radii would be useful. And I'd like to have very small radius curves (excl. half diagonals for simplicity), and trains would pass them...

May I ask for very large radius rail curves, for aesthetic purposes? They look more natural. Also, current curves might require significant train slowdown, so large radii would be useful. And I'd like to have very small radius curves (excl. half diagonals for simplicity), and trains would pass them ...

I definitely will try 2.0. Will I play it? You mean, will I abandon my unfinished megabase? I think no, unless some killer features will be introduced. Advanced rails will not kill my base. Anyway, I think I will not start large megabase in 2.0 at once, I will wait for most serious bugfixes and bala...

Which others did you find? I think there are several important points. I should refresh my memory, but unfortunately, I lost motivation of spending time on re-reading entire discussion again. After the last FFF, I have feeling that kovarex is not going to change something, there's not a single sign...

The 35-page discussion was very low quality, mostly talking about unimportant things like the name and useless critique based on misunderstanding of the quality system. And it was mostly redundant. It wasn't really 35 pages of discussion, it was 35 pages of the same post redundantly posted in copie...