Cordylus wrote:

kovarex wrote: [*]Features
[*]Blueprints can be built over things marked for deconstruction.
[*]Blueprints can be force placed using alternative build mode (shift click).

It happened!

Victory! Cheers for the +1's everyone.

Really liking this mod! It's such a simple little thing but it allows making compact production so much easier, allowing you to use the same belt for multiple things without a bunch of overflow, spill or using smart inserters to remove things and return them.

http://i.imgur.com/ApH4qZT.png

My ...

I don't know if this feature is useful for underground belts. Pipes block the space they are laid on, that's the reason they are used for longer tracks. Belts don't have this problem.

Well, but this would make is consistent with everything else, so I support this idea even for underground belts ...

Yet again I feel like I'm probably missing a topic that is bound to exist, but I couldn't find anything using search so...

A simple suggestion that I can only assume is already planned, pipes that we can control with wires.

For example: When there are less than 100 sulfur in the logistics system ...

sparr wrote:You can drag-and-run to lay down properly spaced power poles.

Oh god, you can? This changes everything!

Also yes, I support the same functionality for underground pipes, and also for underground belts.

infinite generation of a burnable fuel.
Already exists in the form of oil -> solid fuel, seeing as oil wells never truly run out.

Still, being able to turn sunlight (and other power sources through mods, like Wind) into some kind of burnable/solid fuel is a great idea. I'll definitely check it ...

Old version crashed every time I tried to craft one. Now it seems to work, going to do some further testing. Looks like this combined with Slipstream Chests could create a really efficient sorting system.

I add, that it would be supercool to place a blueprint above trees, so that the bots will first cut the trees and then place the entity.
I approve of this generally, although cutting trees with the deconstruction print is quite easy already... the problem is that you have to wait for them to ...

Looking forward to seeing this mod patched, looks really good.

Nova wrote:The real question is: Why the hell should you place 100 roboports??? o_O

Why not? The sky is the limit!

A single basic chest type whose input/output can be configured with a GUI, removing individual directional chests (getting away from Belt Storage's implementation).
Filtered/indiscriminate output configuration options.
Passive/active provider and requester variants.
Energy requirements for all ...

Nova wrote:Does that work with 0.11.6?

It's running fine with 0.11.6 for me, after modifying the folder name.

Smart players use smart inserters for this very purpose :twisted: I would actually propose to increase the stacksize of roboports to match whatever it is for other structures.
I hate to be contrary, but I agree with Boogie. Smart Inserters already perfectly control the amount of structures you ...

I searched this forum as best as I could to avoid making a duplicate request, but the search functionality on this forum seems rather bad. I apologize if I missed a thread about this subject.

One major annoyance I've ran into when doing large scale building is when edges or previous construction ...

Welcome new poster.
Congratulations on joining the ranks of hundreds of other forum users that fail to read a topic's last few pages before posting. :roll:

Nah, I read 'em, just wanted to re-iterate things and add my two cents. I figure something requested by many people bears more weight ...

I really like this mod, it reduces the hassle of moving things, having to place down several inserters and do curly loops and all that jazz to get my throughput up. At the same time they feel completely natural, like they belong in the game, and not like some overpowered cheat.

I do however believe ...