Search found 768 matches
- Fri Jun 21, 2024 12:45 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Friday Facts #416 - Fluids 2.0
- Replies: 460
- Views: 62596
Re: Friday Facts #416 - Fluids 2.0
I would suggest that the “output” of a pipe section (aka what a machine can draw from it) shouldn’t only scale by its fill level but also the number of pipes the section consists of (maybe with a threshold and bigger increments). This would somewhat limit the “throughput” of a pipe system and theref...
- Wed Jan 31, 2024 6:47 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Tooltip overflow
- Replies: 2
- Views: 614
Re: Tooltip overflow
Did you try changing the UI scale (settings -> interface -> UI scale -> custom) or dragging the recipes GUI to the top of the screen? Also I'd say the mods an item comes from isn't really necessary unless you want to debug something and then you should rather use the prototype explorer (ctrl+shift+e...
- Sat Nov 11, 2023 7:25 am
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: MAX/MIN functions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1003
Re: MAX/MIN functions
[Ick] Moved to Implemented in 2.0
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 1:23 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: Allow belts in BPs to redirect/upgrade/downgrade existing belts
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2237
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 1:22 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: mark-for-upgrading when blueprinting over fast-replaceable entities
- Replies: 39
- Views: 11109
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 1:12 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: Free cables/wires (Poles contain all)
- Replies: 34
- Views: 26813
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 1:08 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: bridge
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1765
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 1:07 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: bridgs for train?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1704
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 12:59 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: Deconstruct landfill
- Replies: 24
- Views: 14040
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 12:58 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: Fix Landfill Blueprinting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7158
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 12:56 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: Allow placement of water well pumps onto tiles that were previously landfilled
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4117
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 12:55 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: New types of rails (curves, s-curves ...)
- Replies: 30
- Views: 25097
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 12:54 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: Automatically landfill when placing blueprints/ghosts
- Replies: 89
- Views: 47731
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 12:52 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: (Hotkey to) Replace existing structures with blueprint / Replace with bp / Forced bp placing/deconstruction
- Replies: 80
- Views: 44090
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 12:48 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: Tunnel or bridges for trains
- Replies: 113
- Views: 49593
- Sun Oct 22, 2023 8:15 pm
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Suggestions for the expansion.
- Replies: 32
- Views: 3819
Re: Suggestions for the expansion.
Could we all try to make friendly (!) and helpful (for example by providing detailed reproduction steps) comments instead of pretty much harassing people over this small matter? Thank you! :) What came to mind when I read Saphiras comment was the different behaviour of the "shoot enemy" an...
- Sat Oct 14, 2023 7:44 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Friday Facts #380 - Remote view
- Replies: 183
- Views: 39728
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 9:02 pm
- Forum: Implemented in 2.0
- Topic: Redo functionality
- Replies: 51
- Views: 19046
Re: Redo functionality
[Ick] Merged into older thread with same suggestion.
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 3:55 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Friday Facts #380 - Remote view
- Replies: 183
- Views: 39728
Re: Friday Facts #380 - Remote view
Awesome QoL changes! And quite a lot of easter eggs in this weeks FFF:
There seems to be a new ore in the game, some kind of antenna and a second type of cliffs.
There seems to be a new ore in the game, some kind of antenna and a second type of cliffs.
- Mon Oct 09, 2023 5:00 pm
- Forum: Wiki Talk
- Topic: Delete archived wiki items
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1461
Re: Delete archived wiki items
Another issue that I neglected to mention is that sometimes people miss the "Archived" box on the page and assume the page is talking about current page content. But likely this issue can already be reduced by removing the pages from the default search. I agree with your last point there....