Rather unexpectedly technology_to_unlock means the shortcut will be available if you researched that technology already in any game. It is used by the base game for the blueprint shortcuts that are supposed to be only available later in the game for new players, but right from the start for experien...

Keep it civil! Arguing on topic can be done without personal attacks.

For reference see 99191. At least the thing about the burner mining drill was already reported.

As a very hacky workaround you could make multiple entities with parts of the animation and then replace them every few ticks.

Just stumbled upon this in-game and what strikes me as odd is that the electric mining drill ghost in your hand has the fluid inputs. Only when I place it down it changes to the normal miner ghost again.

I think this is a reasonable answer: If the alterations are made by another mod within the Factorio environment, then those altered artifacts are *never distributed*. They are recreated each time the game is loaded on a particular machine. Most licenses on the mod portal only prohibit *distributing*...

On a related note: I would really like to be able to conditionally create runtime settings based on the value of a startup setting. My use case is a startup setting that enables a feature and multiple runtime settings to “fine tune” it. It really makes no sense having the runtime settings available ...

I would like to request an event called on_player_controller_changed or something similar. As I understand it this could solve the issue presented here as well (that's why I am posting here). My use case is that I want to know when another mod changes the controller. There already is on_player_toggl...

Nun, wir müssen uns bei der Übersetzung vor allem am Originaltext orientieren: Runs automated schedules and pulls rolling stock. Der Punkt wäre also drin :lol: Ein "kann" hinzufügen wäre noch akzeptabel würde ich sagen. Mein Gedanke wäre noch, dass an anderen Stellen "rolling stock&qu...

Yeah, didn’t consider Factorissimo. I was more thinking about SpaceExploration. So maybe a combination of both? On surface creation the modder is able to define whether the statistics should be added to another surface (for things like Factorissimo) and in the statistics GUI the player can group mul...

Usul wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 13, 2022 8:30 am

Hallo Tertius! Danke für die Erläuterungen! Kannst du mir bitte den gefallen tun und in Crowdin den o.g. Schreibfehler korrigieren? Ich kenne mich da nicht aus. Das wäre nett, vielen Dank!

Ich habe mir mal erlaubt die Änderung vorzuschlagen. Danke dir für den Hinweis!

in theory it could be possible to isolate separate rail networks as in most cases they are unable to interact with each other making it a candidate for a trains pathfinder You mean something like the transport lines but for rail networks? but then the update of trains themselves is also sequential ...

I'd probably make it opt-in. What? The surfaces? The statistics? That needs a bit more flesh :) I can think of two ways to approach this: 1. A parameter for surface creation so modders can tell the game whether they want a separate statistic or not. They could probably even take player input into a...

Maybe this thread helps you solve the problem: 101341

If you can reproduce it, I think it might be worth to make a bug report about it.

I don’t understand the discussion about the price. They clearly state: The general goal is to make the expansion feel like as big an addition as the whole vanilla game. This is why we plan to price it at $30.00 The vanilla game costs $30, the expansion will cost another $30. There plan is to double ...

You can do this already, this is how: Instead of filtering for steel, the first splitter should have an output priority to the right. Remove the second splitter and put the underground belt directly in front of the right side of the first splitter. Because the copper is blocked by the side of the un...

As this was brought up again here I'd like to "put my mustard to it" as we Germans say. :lol: My suggestions to at least try to mitigate this problem would be as follows: Use "Ziffernblock" instead of "Nummernblock". It's at least a bit shorter. Omit "taste" i...

It’s most likely a bug from a mod or a conflict between mods. If you provide a save file I (or someone else) can take a look at it.