When I was working on a grid aligned rail system I came up with the following design for a T intersection that both seems more compact than anything (other than the bottle) posted so far and seems to be a unique design as far as I can tell (you can trim it down a bit if you didn't want to fit it ...

hldswrth wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2024 2:36 pm What I consider a cleaner Celtic Knot elevated 4-way 2 rail LHT intersection, scored around 95-100 when tested: https://factoriobin.com/post/l0ug0s

12-22-2024, 14-36-29.png

Nice, added it!

Made a rail book that fits between city blocks.
The trains per minute on the 3-way intersection is only 70-80 though.

0eNrtXV1v5Thy/SsDP/suxG9qgDzlJXkNFnlZLAZu951uYzy2121PMhv0f48o6X7YLkrnqNjT2Y2fWuorH1FksVhFVp36n4sPt8/7h8ebu6efPtzf/3Lx4/+c/ufLxY9/Obstv325u3rYPd3vPj3efCz3/33xo+m6y4vfx3 ...

Hovedgade wrote: Sun Dec 08, 2024 12:04 pm

hansjoachim wrote: Fri Dec 06, 2024 9:46 pm Reply to me if something is missing <3

viewtopic.php?p=625779#p625779

I didn't add that one since its 2 to 4 lane. It needs its separate catagory.

What do all of you think about quality fuel when testing intersections?

Awesome! I updated the thread, added the T section and T cross and yaongi mk 1 and also the turbo ones. Reply to me if something is missing <3

mmmPI wrote: Sun Oct 27, 2024 1:18 am 10-27-2024, 02-13-35.png
Step to reproduce :

Load new scenario
Place blueprint
Change settings to this :
10-27-2024, 02-15-36.png
Click confirm
Click Start/Stop.

Fixed, bracket placed wrong. (Direction+8 %16) instead of (Direction+8) %16

[/quote]
Tried testbenchcontrols 2.0.4 but it still detects this intersection as LHT
[/quote]

Now i re did the 1.1 to 2.0 conversion and LHT/RHT should be fixed, including also the Everything test and also a couple other things:)

im unsure how well the tester will deal with these, but i find them very useful in mega bases
4 lain mainline with a 2lane branch off it. the pathing weights have to be modified abit to get it working right (should have about equal spawns/outputs for each seperate direction, and 4lane parts should ...

So, now the testbench controls mod is fully updated to 2.0.
I started with hacky solution. But now I started over with the 1.1 version and updated it correctly.
Also, not changed yet. Set 2 and 3 does not make sense for elevated rail intersections so will eventually not be tested, so either set to ...

I'm an idiot. Sorry
Tberra is great at a lot of things and i went too far.

. Im sorry i went too far and raged too much

.

Getting support for it would be really helpful for my mod as with it I can automatically place safe outputs for train intersections and automatically test all the intersections.

If I do

if entity.type == "rail-signal" then
connections = connections.entity

I get nil as connections.entity isnt ...

"Inverted Diamond", "Inside Roundabout" ("In-and-about?" Not 100% on the name yet)
08-25-2024, 20-58-58.png

North-South is RHT, East-West is LHT (Trains can enter from the North-West and South-East, Trains leave from the South-West and North-East)
0eNqdmstu4zYUhl+F0FoORIoiRS ...

i have an issue. i save and exited while the tester was still running, now the save errors on load (or a fraction of a second after it at least)

is there anything i can do? some recent designs are on that save and not backed up as bp strings

EDIT: managed to fix it with a "pause multiplayer if ...

Yeah, when you load up a save it resets some values which probably caused it. I can change that:)
Also if you manage to hit the stop button as soon as it loads that should fix it.

That is really cool:) insane numbers:)
I like that you could just adjust the testing map, did you find any issues when doing so? I see that the mod fails in counting number of lanes, that is fixable.
Also how is performance? I remember in the old testbench something like this would barely run ...

For the fun of it i decided to do a test for a 16 lane multicross (buffers between crossings could probably be better optimized)
very good even split distribution, not great all crossing (tbf, a train trying to turn right[on lhd] has to cross 60 tracks on its way through the 1100x1100 intersection ...

While waiting for 2.0, I've been trying to adapt 'Parallel multicross 4lane' into a T junction.

The result is a bit smaller than 'Multifork' while getting a slightly better score (127 total - set1 146, set2 108).

https://factoriobin.com/post/MkKtJJXI


Is there any obvious issue with this design ...