Hi, I'm not sure if your still activly working on the 0.16 Factorio version of this mod but. I have a Mod Conflict to Report, When You use Pressurized Fluids It Has an issue with A Fluid It creates. Here's a imgur of the Error on Factorio Startup. https://imgur.com/a/3OXunmj Here's the Links to the...

Adamo wrote: ↑

Sun Aug 11, 2019 10:05 pm

BlueTemplar wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 12, 2019 3:06 pm

Sorry, I should've been a bit clearer. When I think about fixing fluid mechanics, I'm thinking more about getting it to split correctly at junctions, etc.

Haha, I am a native speaker, but I’m typing on a phone and my fingers are a little big for the keys, so....

I would think the one with an “i” in it, but check see which form the mod portal uses.

I could be wrong, but I beleive depreciating just hides the listing in the in game mod manager for new downloads, but doesn’t prevent it from noticing an update for it. But what you could do if in doubt is put the DEPRECIATED part into the mod name, but don’t actually check the depreciated option on...

I would say in addition to the thoughts you already had with the dependency and conflicts, also change the description on you mod to say it’s depreciated, change the mod name (not file name) so it’s not the same as the other mod (maybe add DEPRECIATED to it), and maybe even empty out/delete all of t...

IMO, if a mod does something wrong, then it’s the mod’s fault. Not adding an API for something because a mod could potentially do something doesn’t make sense to me. But I guess this goes along with us being told that we shouldn’t be using compound entities, and yet it’s the only way to achieve what...

Dixi wrote: ↑

Sun Aug 11, 2019 5:54 pm

We asking about liquids flow in pipes, that works kinda bad now. We see a pipe of a good diameter (I'd say about one meter+ visually, and it performs so badly.

Isn’t it less than 1m diameter considering the tiles are 1m square?

Still, yes, it’d be nice to have the fluid mechanics fixed.

While there are multiple mods to take care of this, I do agree that this kind of cleanup should be in vanilla.

I don’t feel as though landfill needs to be made cheaper. Or you need 2 items to fill the shallow water, 3 for normal water tiles and 4 items to fill deep water tiles. While I know most would be against it, I’m for this as well, though I’d also go for something like deep water requires turning the i...

You probably should report them anyway, though in principle I don’t disagree with you.

Glad I saw this post.

Yeah, I was wondering about the trending numbers and was feeling the same way about it as the OP in that if something happens to go negative, it may have an impact on whether or not someone downloads it simply because it's negative.

Right, In case anyone wants it: Pre 0.17.60 Oil And in case anyone wanted to test other suggested alternatives that the devs decided weren't better than the path they went: Heavy Oil and Gas from Basic Oil Sulfur Production from Oils Adamo Carbon Light Oil Only Heavy Oil Chemical Science https://mo...

Shameless plug, but check my sig. I'm maintaining the Diesel Locomotive mod now that allows for locos to have fluid fuel input. Still working on some changes adaptations, etc. Also working on another mod that is attempting to make the normal loco a steam loco, as well as giving them all a heavier f...

IMO, the rail planner sequence is an additional proof of their dedication. They implemented an nice feature, removed it for good reasons, and then reimplemented it as several players said they missed it. The lazy, easy-money path would have been "let it just be in an unfinished state, people a...

Sure, but you are not talking about the new players that is what it is done for. A new player after many hours still does not find challenges until the AO, it will take more than 15 hours of boring game and you will find what is avoided that you are 5 hours before, it is absurd. All we experienced ...

DanGio wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 08, 2019 6:21 pm

If he does a ton of batteries or a ton of reds, he's blocked. (to say it shortly, I know it's more subtile than that)

While I don't support the LO/PG BOP version, I will say that if a player is going to produce all of one thing, neglecting everything else, then blockage should be expected.

Move sulfur -> HO And how do you handle LO ? Leave SF on blue science and trains can run on SF. Even send it to your smelters. With less fluid going to SF, you produce less of it thus need less consumers. That's true, but it brings us back at square 1, as it still relies on an expected player behav...

Sulfur is the primary waste product from oil refining, whether petroleum or natural gas. Great amounts of research continue to go into figuring out what to do with all that damn sulfur. Concrete is a waste product in the sense that the waste sulfur is used both to make sulfur concrete and to make c...

DanGio wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:52 pm

FuryoftheStars wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:49 pm

Move sulfur -> HO

And how do you handle LO ?

Leave SF on blue science and trains can run on SF. Even send it to your smelters. With less fluid going to SF, you produce less of it thus need less consumers.

Koub wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:27 pm

- Until you were backed up on solid fuel.
- In that case add more storage chests for solid fuel
- but I don't need that much solud fuel, I'm on solar"
...
Now, this discussion will never have to happen at that point.

Move sulfur -> HO