just a sidenote: then we also need a way to cancel all recipes with 1 action, instead of this mindless hundret times clicking to cancel all these single orders

nevermind i forgott you can take a roboport in the hand to achieve the effect

when i am far away or whenever i need to be connected to the logisticnetwork and sometimes i walk out of it by accident and then all bots stop delivering etc... so i hover over the roboport to see where it is and where i can walk but then this hovering goes away and i have to put the mouse over the ...

sometimes i double click and end up closing the game by accident, what a catastrophe!!

draw it plz

when it is so ridicoulus why don't you already make a mod that makes this change...

its always helpfull when working on lane balancers to see them in action...

there is a debug option in f3? where you can enhance the minimal zoom in factor just fyi, so you can zoom more in

ok i understand this works indeed with the only requirement to have full belt on each side... this is not perfect but it works. +1 gg

Now find a way so it works without having to buffer 8 items...

Chests are manually primed with requested item can you please qoute the part of the challenge description where it sais: it is guaranteed that the items on one part of the belt are always the same... despite the image that created the illusion of this text existing - this text is not part of the ch...

boskid wrote: ↑

Fri Aug 02, 2019 2:44 pm

Lets complicate stuff a little:
lane-exchange-with-filter-spliter.png

but this is excellent use of replacing normal iron with gears, cool

disentius wrote: ↑

Fri Aug 02, 2019 2:30 pm

spit!.gif

boskid wrote: ↑

Fri Aug 02, 2019 2:44 pm

split-lanes-without-ub.png

-- edit:
Lets complicate stuff a little:
lane-exchange-with-filter-spliter.png

sadly you both get 0 points due to not beeing able to read the challenge requirements protip: NO FILTERS

BlueTemplar wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 01, 2019 9:41 pm

not bad but still not 100% reliant

+ this just looks like replacing one bug with another - wouldnt the item get pushed to the other side by the other...

Koub wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 01, 2019 9:20 pm

And then you realize than an inserter can not only insert things into a container, but also extract things from containers, and the universe collapses into a singularity.

why not rename it to tentacle

Koub wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 01, 2019 9:20 pm

And then you realize than an inserter can not only insert things into a container, but also extract things from containers, and the universe collapses into a singularity.

oh ma gooooooooooooooooooooooood

here: CHALLENGE TIME::: rebuild this functionality !!!WITHOUT!!! underground-belt e: and ofcourse without filters... https://i.imgur.com/FwcDQAC.jpg --- and because this is not possible, the devs will stay with : splitting belts with ug-belts is not a bug --- but obvously it is because just look at ...

netmand wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 01, 2019 9:09 pm

oh and if you weren't just making fun of the name, you can filter items through the splitter or configure it to prioritize one side or the other.

yes but these functions have nothing to do with my issue... 1s i will explain further

um, if you're going to be picky, I would have thought you would depict half a belt coming out of each side of your splitter ... or items being split in half after running through it... however i guess thats also a good idea - its only the problem that you cannot reproduce splitting a lane in 2 half...

what is a splitter? it "splits" .... what does the current "splitter" do... actually: it "branches", e: or "mixes" a splitter would be more like this? https://i.imgur.com/eoK9tRN.jpg --- this leads to the following: removing the ability of underground-belts to actually split or more precisely: preve...

u need processor much stronk