Search found 19 matches
- Thu Jun 25, 2026 1:24 pm
- Forum: Not a bug
- Topic: [2.1.8][Broken compatibility with 2.0] Inserter rotations now depend on belt direction
- Replies: 3
- Views: 928
- Tue Jun 23, 2026 11:10 pm
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [2.1.7] Machine parametrization bypass allowed modules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 606
[2.1.7] Machine parametrization bypass allowed modules

As pictured, the legendary T3 productivity modules for the Substations and Assembling Machine 1 recipes. All machines and recipes are affected.
- Fri Jun 19, 2026 9:44 pm
- Forum: Not a bug
- Topic: [2.0.76] Prioritize higher-quality robots for tasks
- Replies: 1
- Views: 204
[2.0.76] Prioritize higher-quality robots for tasks
Prerequisites:
1. A common quality robot that gets into a closed network designed for higher-quality robots. For example, you tear down a factory, and they try to find a new place.
2. The robot takes the task to deliver to the requester's chest.
Requester chest:
1. Ask for 16 bioflux. Logic ...
1. A common quality robot that gets into a closed network designed for higher-quality robots. For example, you tear down a factory, and they try to find a new place.
2. The robot takes the task to deliver to the requester's chest.
Requester chest:
1. Ask for 16 bioflux. Logic ...
- Sun Nov 02, 2025 2:05 pm
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Give Programmable Speaker Higher Power Priority
- Replies: 1
- Views: 557
- Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:14 am
- Forum: Balancing
- Topic: Quality should increase train wagons capacity.
- Replies: 67
- Views: 25450
- Fri Oct 24, 2025 10:31 am
- Forum: Balancing
- Topic: Quality should increase train wagons capacity.
- Replies: 67
- Views: 25450
- Mon Oct 20, 2025 8:32 am
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [2.0.69] UTF-8 with BOM encoding causes blueprint import exception on Linux
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1021
[2.0.69] UTF-8 with BOM encoding causes blueprint import exception on Linux
If you save a blueprint on Windows with UTF-8 with BOM encoding, anyone who will use it on Linux won't be able to import it, causing Invalid version:'(' exception.
More info in this Github thread: https://github.com/Xeinaemm/Factorio-Ti ... /issues/20
More info in this Github thread: https://github.com/Xeinaemm/Factorio-Ti ... /issues/20
- Wed Oct 01, 2025 11:10 am
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Unified unloading priority list to prevent undesired machine deadlocks when handling many items
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1340
- Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:45 am
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Unified unloading priority list to prevent undesired machine deadlocks when handling many items
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1340
- Tue Sep 23, 2025 6:31 pm
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Consistency of the loader
- Replies: 1
- Views: 914
- Tue Sep 23, 2025 2:09 pm
- Forum: Not a bug
- Topic: [2.0.66] Loader should respect belt stacking for unload
- Replies: 4
- Views: 887
Re: [2.0.66] Loader should respect belt stacking for unload
So your bug report is actually a modding interface request in disguise to change a default value of the max_belt_stack_size
It's my only legal option to do that.
which would cause compatibility problems between vanilla executable and SA executable
SA added turbo loaders, so somewhere is a ...
It's my only legal option to do that.
which would cause compatibility problems between vanilla executable and SA executable
SA added turbo loaders, so somewhere is a ...
- Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:44 pm
- Forum: Not a bug
- Topic: [2.0.66] Loader should respect belt stacking for unload
- Replies: 4
- Views: 887
Re: [2.0.66] Loader should respect belt stacking for unload
Yes, this is what mod does, changes to max_belt_stack_size = 4
- Tue Sep 23, 2025 1:30 pm
- Forum: Not a bug
- Topic: [2.0.66] Loader should respect belt stacking for unload
- Replies: 4
- Views: 887
[2.0.66] Loader should respect belt stacking for unload
Currently, loaders can load up to 240/s but can only unload up to 60/s.
It would mean a lot for me, save UPS, space, and share the testing lab without forcing others to install a specific mod.
Expected result after fix(currently mod):

It would mean a lot for me, save UPS, space, and share the testing lab without forcing others to install a specific mod.
Expected result after fix(currently mod):

- Tue Dec 24, 2024 11:12 am
- Forum: Pending
- Topic: [2.0.28] Water production with steam condensation recipe limited to ~2k/s
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2302
- Tue Dec 24, 2024 10:08 am
- Forum: Duplicates
- Topic: [2.0.28] Transport belt production limited to 180/s per Foundry
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1635
- Tue Dec 10, 2024 9:08 pm
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [2.0.16] Holmium Plate not producing at stated rate
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7031
- Fri Dec 06, 2024 10:05 am
- Forum: Releases
- Topic: Version 2.0.24
- Replies: 54
- Views: 47315
- Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:21 am
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Pumps max pump rate controlled by circuit network
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6279
- Mon Nov 18, 2024 7:36 pm
- Forum: Resolved Problems and Bugs
- Topic: [2.0.16] Holmium Plate not producing at stated rate
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7031