Koub wrote: ↑

Thu Dec 06, 2018 12:56 pm

You can't please everyone. Some people are paranoid about their privacy.

Thanks for saving my life. It's damn good to be aware of that...

Damn, I didn't want to discuss any more, but your answer doesn't let me any choice. It's so full of flaws in your reasoning. :( Me neither. Same here. Don't get me wrong. This isn't about having the last word. It's about convincing the other party that you are right. Why am I getting a notification...

Why am I getting a notification from an age old topic? I could repeat the arguements from my request , but that let us nothing but turn in circles. Enough is said by now. I only can hope that people understand sometimes in future that opt-out is in general a data privacy desaster, no matter how lon...

Is that finally a Wube software logo?

If I was part of handling this in the Duracell company I would have proposed contacting the Factorio team and not only allow them to include the battery design into their game but also offer them money to go ahead and list Duracell as sponsor. Sigh... If you're a multinational battery manufacurer y...

Wait... decoratives take up almost 30% of the save?

https://mods.factorio.com/mod/platforms Those platforms are broken. They can accidentally kill the player. I'm not kidding! You DIE if you mine it from under yourself. So? You remove the land, you drown, you die. Don't do that. It's realistic. :) But maybe one should be at least smart enough not to...

The only problem here is that it would increase the cost of a full 90° turn from 7 to 9 items, but nothing is perfect. It cost so for me already. 4 per curved, 9 per 90°, 36 per circle. Why is it less for you? Oh my god I just realizied... I'm an idiot... Curved track does cost 4 items... I thought...

1. As far as I understood here you suggest splitting curved track on halves and insert sloped 2/1 piece between them. That's right. If I understood right, would you want to allow old smaller circles or would you force player to lay new larger versions? I wouldn't want to allow the old 0° to 45° cur...

Zavian wrote: ↑

Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:22 pm

https://mods.factorio.com/mod/platforms

Those platforms are broken. They can accidentally kill the player. I'm not kidding! You DIE if you mine it from under yourself.

HurkWurk wrote: ↑

Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:04 pm

industrial battery:

Whoa! That... could look nice...

So I was just pointing out, that while I still disapprove, it is completely official now, as they made a change that specifically says it is considered intentional now. Originally, the mechanic emerged from items on one half of the belt colliding with underground belt structure while items on the o...

Do items still move faster on the inside of a curved belt? Thankfully, both sides of a belt go at the same speed, so no need to add higher tier belts on each corner to keep throughput :) It used to be necessary, and it was a real pain in the ass :mrgreen: Do you mean they move at the same speed or ...

They probably should have marked 0.15 as the end of development and made the stable-0.15 into 1.0 and everthing afterwards should have probably been work on Factorio 2 or an expansion and in the case of an expansion they could have released some of the stuff also for free for the vanilla version, l...

Awww.... what is this?!

They admitted that 0.17 won't be it.

Now... will it be 0.18?

At the time of writing, 0.18 is the most popular option.

Please tell me you do something with the landfill's game soft-locking nature in sandbox servers with limited world size.

Reika wrote: ↑

Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:16 pm

Yet even I simply cannot play with the FFF's biters on my screen.

How do you know without trying?

Well I definitely won't be feeling sorry for them now!