Not mine ...

I expected the release to be June 30th (they just said 'June'), so in my opinion, June 27th is 3 days earlier than expected, and 3 days before their previous deadline.

NAT punching is a PITA, so nice work getting that working. I hope NAT's all die in a fire when ipv6 is fully adopted.

IPv6? OMG ...

Adil wrote:will there be possibility of having different types of inserters with different stack sizes?

Hey, I prefer this idea!

Inserts nerfed. Now I have reasons to start over with a new map.

#137
wrong number again!~~~

daniel34 wrote:Yes, the developers receive more money if you buy the game on the website. In addition to the DRM free version of Factorio you will also receive a steam key.

W... What?!
Then what have I done!

I'm not sure if you are just trolling, but is there a difference?
Why? To be honest I didn't get it. What words should I have chosen? (This is a real question)

Can you provide an example of the 2d-stretching such that it doesn't look like rubber?
I'll try. (But I'm not an expert at 3D ...

Stretching the graphics is not the problem. The problem is that you didn't do it properly.

https://eu4.factorio.com/assets//img/blog/fff-133-train-distorsion-test.gif
Looks like your have stretched the length in the 3D model . (Like the length is a linear function of the rotation, that's why it ...

Stretch the graphics will solve the problem.
The only problem that makes it look like rubber is that the timing function was not correct.
It's not the length in 3D-space is linear to the rotation.
It's the graphics should scale in 2D-space, with X and Y individually.