Search found 4 matches
- Mon Dec 02, 2024 9:19 pm
- Forum: Ideas and Suggestions
- Topic: Improve recycler belt stacking
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4814
Re: Improve recycler belt stacking
Fully agree. Sorting scrap with belts becomes really annoying when you start doing it at a larger scale and this would make it much more viable. Maybe there could also be an option to force it to only output a certain stack size like with inserters.
- Sat Nov 30, 2024 9:18 am
- Forum: Balancing
- Topic: Quality big poles should be longer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1723
Quality big poles should be longer
Power poles have enjoyed a huge buff with quality, especially medium power poles which go from 7x7 to 17x17, a whopping 5.9x buff, rivaling a base quality substation while having a 1x1 footprint. big poles however, have not been buffed like this.
Every power pole scales the same way regardless of ...
Every power pole scales the same way regardless of ...
- Sun Nov 03, 2024 4:12 pm
- Forum: Balancing
- Topic: Heat exchangers unchanged with new fluid system
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1339
Re: Heat exchangers unchanged with new fluid system
Wow I never knew that. but the steam turbine production of 5.82 can maybe also be changed.
All of this system is based around the old fluid system having the pipe throughput of 1033 fluid/s over a distance of 100 pipes, which was so that you could reasonably supply all your heat engagers with enough ...
All of this system is based around the old fluid system having the pipe throughput of 1033 fluid/s over a distance of 100 pipes, which was so that you could reasonably supply all your heat engagers with enough ...
- Tue Oct 29, 2024 8:38 am
- Forum: Balancing
- Topic: Heat exchangers unchanged with new fluid system
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1339
Heat exchangers unchanged with new fluid system
With the new changes to fluids basically giving infinite throughput in a limited area, it doesn't make sense for heat engagers to still be providing 103 steam per second. could it changed to a more even exchanger:turbine ratio like 3:5, which would require only 3 less steam per second. it kinda just ...