Long I think you could do that very cleanly by having the interaction be with blueprints, no special selector required. Something like clicking on a logistics group with blueprint in hand adds its contents to the group, or an option to create a group from a blueprint. That would definitely work, al...

I have another idea for a feature request that sounds very useful in my humble opinion, and it follows logically from the new logistic group feature (and the new remote building): With the new logistic groups, you can add a new group, for example "outpost building", manually add everything...

Half of the replies seem to be about what people want or want not to happen in one of the 3 modes. So my suggestion: Add a new tool to the quick action bar that brings up a mini-config menu. | Normal | Shift | Shift+Ctrl | ------------------+--------+-------+------------+ Add Landfill | [ ] | [ ] |...

I have one request though: now that you have super force building. Maybe it is a good idea to move cliff deconstruction to super force building instead of regular force building? That would be nice. I too have had situations where I destroy cliffs when I didn't mean to and it can be frustrating. I ...

While you're reworking logistics, could you add the ability to re-order the rows? I often decide that I want to insert a row, but I can only append. thanks <3 Look at the lines next to the trash can icons. Those are the drag-and-drop markings, showing that they are already possible to re-order. the...

By default you will multiply the contents by -1, not -2. You sum this with the required values, this means, only the positive values are the missing values (You need more than you have). And the filter inserter, when configured to set filter based on circuit signals only works on positive values, s...

Also, I am having a hard time deciphering how this combinator system works in this screenshot from the FFF: https://cdn.factorio.com/assets/blog-sync/fff-382-wall-resupply.png I figured the arithmetic combinator multiplies the contents of the chest by -2, but I have not figured out how this helps th...

Fantastic addition! The thing many have been looking forward to (including myself) and predicted based on the rpevious FFF's! I have one request though: now that you have super force building. Maybe it is a good idea to move cliff deconstruction to super force building instead of regular force build...

I like the idea, but i think it also introduce something maybe unforeseen, because in Nauvis there is a "starting location" which is your respawn point when you die, i suppose in other planets the respawn point will be the 1 landing pad, or if you die in space, though that could also be t...

I see many people complaining about the maximum of one landing pad per planet. While I do not care about that myself because I don't build megabases (I only play to win the game), I do see their point AND also the developer's point, and I propose this solution: Only allow planets to have multiple la...

2. Elevated rails look too high up (i.e. too far offset in the Y axis). It would look better only offset a little bit, to the ramps don't look so steep. There's a lot of visual trickery going on to make things look isometric, so it doesn't need to be at the "correct" height, instead a hei...

Tooster wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 29, 2023 2:30 pm

Q: in what way do big connection poles collide? Only the entities or do the wires collide as well?

Only the entities. You can see power cables intersecting with the elevated railway tracks in one (or more) of the screenshots in the FF blog post.

Would an elevated artillery train be invulnerable? This is an important question that needs answering. Also, an elevated arty train over a lake. It doesn't look like you can elevate stations, and artillery trains don't fire when stopped at signals. You could landfill yourself a tiny island though, ...

The new research thing seems like a pretty minor change, imho. Not clear to me that will make much of a difference in the game. If you are moving along with reasonable efficiency, you generally like to start drilling/mining/crafting/producing ahead of time anyways before the science gets unlocked. ...

Cerberus wrote: ↑

Sat Sep 16, 2023 12:16 am

I wonder if manually crafting something counts. Blue chips you can not do manually and neither can oil or steel, but uranium for example sure can.

Just realized what I wrote is untrue anyway, you can't because you need acid

I wonder if manually crafting something counts. Blue chips you can not do manually and neither can oil or steel, but uranium for example sure can.

It sounds more like they are going to take existing end game content and keep it as end game content instead of making new end game content. Again, I'm sure there are some big ideas planned but from what we've seen so far it is 'move this previously unlocked tech to a new planet and call it some mi...

- Are the triggers retroactive when they become available? What if you already mined uranium before your research tree gets far enough to get to centrifuges? The game already tracks production statistics for everything. So the most natural implementation would be to just look at those, rather than ...

I don’t think I’ve seen this as feedback yet, but the alt-mode icons for quality filters on splitters are incredibly difficult to make out. Especially the “base quality” icon which is a gray dot (over a gray mechanical sprite). I hadn’t noticed this in the original Quality FFF because the images we...

I am really excited about this expansion pack, as I was when it was first announced. One year is still a long time, so to solve that I started playing the Space Exploration mod because it was referenced in one of the previous FFs. Apparently the average time to finish it is 500 hours,so now one year...