In my opinion, the "last minute changes" are mostly things not mentioned in FFF:

- Basic asteroid crushing change
- Hazard concrete change
- Railgun shooting speed change
- etc.

Since there wasn't an announcement in the previous FFF, I expected there will be another FFF before beta release ...

In my opinion, the "last minute changes" are mostly things not mentioned in FFF:

- Basic asteroid crushing change
- Hazard concrete change
- Railgun shooting speed change
- etc.

Since there wasn't an announcement in the previous FFF, I expected there will be another FFF before beta release ...

Les goooo. 2.1 is here

At that point you're overinflating the power of space casinos. Even if you build a space casino you'd still need to gather many other materials by repeating the conventional methods across multiple production chains, so why is a bit more variety that big of a problem? I don't think ...

There are actually two other approaches to quality - trickle and filter from regular production lines and then the dedicated upcycling. One is extremely boring and the other does not scale well at all. Yes, the space casino was OP, but the core reason why so many people use it is because ...

The Space Casino nerf is extremely disappointing. It was one of the few places where you could apply a creative solution to quality.

We don't want to be fun killers, but it just makes any other approach to quality obsolete.

Yes, because there is one [0] other approach to quality. Is the ...

People use space casino cause exactly was boring solution to logistic problem and it is easy to setup and bypass biggest points of quality. People want easy rewards without putting any work to getting them.


How is the intended solution to quality any less boring?


You are asking how ...

The Space Casino nerf is extremely disappointing. It was one of the few places where you could apply a creative solution to quality.

We don't want to be fun killers, but it just makes any other approach to quality obsolete.

Yes, because there is one [0] other approach to quality. Is the ...

The reason for assembler recipe is so that you can cold start Gleba without need to feed biochamber.

Im against any change cause someone has problem that it is already solvable by already existing things and this blaancing would change other things that would had to be balanced due to this. Someone forgot that this change would lead to balancing asterodis casue some people use steam power to fuel ...

That would be neat addition to train overview window

Thank you very much for the links.

The thruster is not challenging, it is simply a pain. Not funny at all.

The same "challenge" word was used in Factorio 1.* for Oil processing facilities, and guess what? Now they can be flipped in Factorio 2.0

So please don't use this as an excuse for not ...

Any suggestions how to do that other than asking make them better?

Cause they are already pretty smart. You cant make them human smart without tanking performance

Why would devs solve your own problem of mixing mods that don't mix well in this case?
Or setup proper defense?

No. Why programmers should "fix" and complicate code for no real gain rather than player fix their skill issue.

What would be point of it tho? You already have infinite tech that gives you more research per science pack

That change with Yello bar lloks good

That would be nice. I had to make some defenses on the empty land then copy paste that on ship cause bigger range turrets were obscuring gun ones.

There is literaly zero logical reason stated here why any of those ideas should be implemented. If you want to play broken game like that just download mods - there is your tick box for each idea that you were suggesting

So let me be clear, you want remove entire point of Quality mechanic and just get rewards from it? It is easier to download mod that gives you quality you want rather than rewrite entire automatic thing that we have now to cater to your suggestion. It isnt like it is novel one we already had dozens ...