Rseding91 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:49 pm My guess; you are running out of RAM and it's paging to disk.

hmmm that makes sense cauze that system only has 4
i ll get some more and see what happens
thanks for fast responce u guys are fuckin pro

.

Rseding91 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 1:50 pm It shows all 3 locations: https://wiki.factorio.com/Application_d ... _directory

Linux distributions:

~/.factorio


terminal responds no such file or directory when i paste the above
sorry dont know much about linux

Loewchen wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 1:39 pm

napouser wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 1:36 pm where i find the log file?

52433

that says where to find it in windows

Rseding91 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 12:50 pm Can you post the save file and your log file?

here is an example

https://factoriobox.1au.us/map/info/cb1 ... a5442ab56c

where i find the log file?

same deal 1.80 1.87

some small maps run fine
some big maps take awhile
stevetrops 20k monolithik takes 5 mins
my map takes forever

linux freezes at 90% 0r 100% loading 250mb save and computer keeps loading forever

Whats that [20] [50] etc?

Also can u bother do an addition of assuming 1 train fuel consumed every 10 and every 20 secs?

[20], [50] etc. are references to the corresponding numbered intermediate formulas, so you know from where equations come.

I don't understand what you mean with the train ...

Aha i see
Yea interesting consept altho it doesnt apply to me since i am only using reactors to burn uranium hoping to get rid off it from the base. Obviusly its so much that u need millions of reactors to consume the whole map but for now i am satisfied if i find the requirement to go from half ...

It's not the numbers of reactors that is relevant but the number of GW of power you consume. Running twice the number of reactors but only fueling it every 400s is more efficient. Although the difference becomes rather small at 640 reactors vs 1280 reactors.

But you should calculate this for ...

No, it'll always cost resources, but the amount of resources removed from the ground is always the same. If you need to mine x iron ore for level 10, then you'll also need to mine x iron ore for level 1000.




No. U need x + 2500 + 2500 + …. for the later levels but i think i get what u saying ...

According to my calculation it's slightly higher than 661.75 [reactors].

Long calculation goes like this.
I included ore refining, kovarex for U-235, reprocessing, all with max amount of prod modules (2 resp. 4). Only flaw: In the calculation, I throw away the U-235 from ore refining and only use ...

I've not derived any formulas, however, it shouldn't be too hard to see that the resource increase provided by the upgrade cannot offset the cost required to research it.





yea its rather obvius to me but for others like nilaus its the opposite
i am just trying to prove it ...

I've not derived any formulas, however, it shouldn't be too hard to see that the resource increase provided by the upgrade cannot offset the cost required to research it.





yea its rather obvius to me but for others like nilaus its the opposite
i am just trying to prove it mathematically ...

MEOWMI wrote: Wed Oct 12, 2022 12:49 pm

I've not derived any formulas, however, it shouldn't be too hard to see that the resource increase provided by the upgrade cannot offset the cost required to research it.

yea its rather obvius to me but for others like nilaus its the opposite
i am just trying to prove it mathematically

It's not the numbers of reactors that is relevant but the number of GW of power you consume. Running twice the number of reactors but only fueling it every 400s is more efficient. Although the difference becomes rather small at 640 reactors vs 1280 reactors.

But you should calculate this for an ...

so lets say u start with a stadard map

u get access to some basic resources lets say 200k of iron and u start making stuff

eventually u get more mines and advance to finish game

continue to get a huge 10000 spm base wich means 100+ mines of ~10mill iron so access to 1000million iron active mines ...

how many reactors takes for full consuption of half conveyor of uranium?



hello

assuming a megabase of 10000spm that requires 50gw of power lets say 400 reactors in complex of 4. 1 reactor is 40mw 4 is 160 but with bonus is 120x4 so 480. lets say 0.5gw x100 of these complex



apparently it seems ...

All of the times are accurate (none of them are ever too big or too small) simply: each time is measuring a specific thing. And the name is a few words so it doesn't convey what all it measures. Not every time is measuring everything someone might think it is and because two might have similar ...