Oh! Now I understand why.

So, thinking the signal as {key: value} pair, the operation is to compare against the "value" rather than the "key". That's what I misunderstand. Then, on top of that, the signal on the right hand side is not counted into the result.

Again, thank you very much!! That ...

Hi, thanks for replying.

Could you clarify what this means: "it is understood that that signal exists only on the right side" more specifically? Does that mean I can't compare with a specific signal? I tried comparing with constant (like numbers) and everything works as expected. So, I can't use a ...

First Case
I met "unexpected" behaviour when I use the "Everything not equals something" operator as follows:
1.png
2.png
In the above situation, I think the condition "should" evaluate to False since one of the signals is indeed the Red Signal. However, the decider combinator checks the ...