Unless you are merging belts, blocking belt lanes or using a belt that transitions from a faster belt to a slower belt, 90% of the time you don't need to lane balance belts. Also you are lane balancing the left belt twice, which is redundant. You are of course correct. My main usecase for input lan...

Here's a slim version, which is probably useful for integration into large busses:

Here I created another version that fully balances both input and output of a dual belt at full speed. I don't think it will get a lot more compact than this. inputOutputBalancer.gif The important principle behind it, as can be seen in Trebor's post, is that the final splitter merges two lanes that ...

@Trebor It took me a while to understand how this balances the two sides of the lane, but now my mind is blown. This is amazing! I will definitely use this one. I'm not sure if you realized, but your design is a full-speed dual lane input balancer. It isn't limited to a single belt. The only drawbac...