Re: Did no one else notice massive nerf of tank in 0.17?
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2019 6:37 pm
Adding the equipment grid to tank would be a lot of fun yeah.
www.factorio.com
https://forums.factorio.com/
Gimme!V453000 wrote: Wed Jan 02, 2019 6:37 pm Adding the equipment grid to tank would be a lot of fun yeah.
in biterbattle scenario destroyed biter bases spawn a huge amount of the corresponding biters, so you will find youself surrounded by a dozen of blue melee biters that arent so easy to drive over, actually this is not possible. this fixed the abusing of driving over enemies bases sufficiently on my opinion - in vanilla though this is a excellent way of destroying the bases i agree5thHorseman wrote: Wed Jan 02, 2019 6:25 am The reason to use the tank gun instead of your gun is obvious: You're in the tank.
Even with the 100% bonus, I never used the tank because of the machine gun. I used the machine gun because I was in the tank. And I used the tank to run over bases and worms. If they haven't nerfed that, they haven't nerfed the tank.
I rest my caseastroshak wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 2:48 am Not going to speak towards mods, but just plain old Vanilla, I never found the Tank to be squishy.
My experience has always been that ramming the spawners has been the most cost-effective and easiest way to use the tank against spawners. Using the cannon was the newbie mistake, because it's too slow firing to do a good job, and the MG is shooting the biters. Damage from ramming spawners has never been much of a problem for me, it's the stampede that comes afterwards, and I need turrets set up nearby to deal with that, and even more without the damage bonus on the MG. I really don't see any point in using the tank at all under these circumstances.Ramming the spawners with the tank, attempting to run over biters/spitters with the tank, are newbie mistakes. Its not a ram, its a protective coating that doesn't steer the way your character does. After clearing out some stuff, hop out and repair. Then hop back in and clear more enemies off the map.
Biters sure, but this newbie has been ramming spawners and worms with the tank at every opportunity for over 600 hours of gameplay and sees no reason to stop.astroshak wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 2:48 am Ramming the spawners with the tank, attempting to run over biters/spitters with the tank, are newbie mistakes. Its not a ram, its a protective coating that doesn't steer the way your character does. After clearing out some stuff, hop out and repair. Then hop back in and clear more enemies off the map.
Whilst it sounds great (and hence I also want it), I suspect it will probably be overpowered unless the grid is really tiny.Jap2.0 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:28 amOkay, we have two devs saying they want it. It's already in the game to the extent that it can easily be used by mods. We better get this in vanilla.
Agreed. One of my favorite things is plowing through a nest of worms and spawners.5thHorseman wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:48 amBiters sure, but this newbie has been ramming spawners and worms with the tank at every opportunity for over 600 hours of gameplay and sees no reason to stop.astroshak wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 2:48 am Ramming the spawners with the tank, attempting to run over biters/spitters with the tank, are newbie mistakes. Its not a ram, its a protective coating that doesn't steer the way your character does. After clearing out some stuff, hop out and repair. Then hop back in and clear more enemies off the map.
This is probably off topic here. But I would also suggest a vehicle roboport, also for trainwagons. I really enjoy angels industries with the crawler trains and vehicles.Jap2.0 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:28 amOkay, we have two devs saying they want it. It's already in the game to the extent that it can easily be used by mods. We better get this in vanilla.
It was very effective, so its nothing wrong with that. Probably, now it is better to use shellsSirLANsalot wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 9:53 am If you used the tank for the MG, then you were using the tank all kinds of wrong.
Well if they add a vehicle grid to tanks, then I expect that you will be able to add personal roboports to the tank. (I'm not expecting to get vehicle grids in vanilla trains though).jodokus31 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:32 pmThis is probably off topic here. But I would also suggest a vehicle roboport, also for trainwagons. I really enjoy angels industries with the crawler trains and vehicles.Jap2.0 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:28 amOkay, we have two devs saying they want it. It's already in the game to the extent that it can easily be used by mods. We better get this in vanilla.
The entire point of adding a grid is to make it powerful. Why bother adding a grid that's too small to use effectively? Why does the tank have to suck?Zavian wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:15 amWhilst it sounds great (and hence I also want it), I suspect it will probably be overpowered unless the grid is really tiny.Jap2.0 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:28 amOkay, we have two devs saying they want it. It's already in the game to the extent that it can easily be used by mods. We better get this in vanilla.
4x4 would probably work. Too small for a fusion generator to be useful, so you would probably go with one shield, a battery and the rest personal solar panels. That would give players some place to use any PSP they crafted earlier. 4x6 might also work.
Holy balls. Personal roboports in a train engine. Hmmmmm...yet another reason to rethink my “no-mods” preference.Zavian wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 2:12 pm Well if they add a vehicle grid to tanks, then I expect that you will be able to add personal roboports to the tank. (I'm not expecting to get vehicle grids in vanilla trains though).
The modules do have a fairly significant cost to them. I'd suggest at least 4x6, hopefully something closer to 6x6. I think having a grid without the space for a fusion reactor is a bit of a shame - the only thing that doesn't really work with it currently is modular armor, and that has two tiers of armor above it. Cargo wagons might work with a smaller grid (as they're fairly low tech and I don't see a ton of uses for an extensive grid in them), as well as cars (because they're slightly less combat-oriented than tanks, and tanks can be considered an upgrade to them). I'm not sure about trains. I do feel like there would be an opportunity to add a few more pieces of equipment specialized towards vehicles, to make more sense and/or be better balanced, and possibly some things that are less combat-oriented, because even though it only occurs in armor right now, it is just an equipment grid, and I feel like it would be possible to add some things that would be useful to vehicles (and possibly yourself!) outside of combat. I'm not entirely sure what - maybe something to increase your inventory size? The obvious parallel for the exoskeleton is something to increase the max. speed of a vehicle (and maybe acceleration, either with or apart from that), but possibly something to allow better turning (in cars and tanks) or better braking speed? I'm not entirely sure where this should go, but I feel there's plenty of opportunity.Zavian wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:15 amWhilst it sounds great (and hence I also want it), I suspect it will probably be overpowered unless the grid is really tiny.Jap2.0 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:28 amOkay, we have two devs saying they want it. It's already in the game to the extent that it can easily be used by mods. We better get this in vanilla.
4x4 would probably work. Too small for a fusion generator to be useful, so you would probably go with one shield, a battery and the rest personal solar panels. That would give players some place to use any PSP they crafted earlier. 4x6 might also work.
This is probably the best solution to make the tank worthwhile. On foot, biters can mob you and pin you down. If the tank could oneshot anything for the sake of keeping moving that'd be entirely too OP. But if instead it pushed biters and spitters out of the way, that's a pretty significant key advantage. Give it defensive upgrades of some form to be able to soak damage from behemoths and you have a proper endgame vehicle.AmbulatoryCortex wrote: Wed Jan 02, 2019 6:11 pm Making it push biters in addition to damaging them would also greatly help.
The thing is I'm not sure the tank is meant to be an endgame vehicle. It's available fairly early, and is potent well into the late mid-game. I think the tank should not stand behemoths, for balance sake.roothorick wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 9:53 pm Give it defensive upgrades of some form to be able to soak damage from behemoths and you have a proper endgame vehicle.
Not with a submachine gun instead of a 100% bonus one. 4x4 is not enough for me to return to the nerfed tank. Heck even the current tank is not enough for me to bother with most games. 4x6 or 4x8 at least. Remember that it competes with BMA.Zavian wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:15 am Whilst it sounds great (and hence I also want it), I suspect it will probably be overpowered unless the grid is really tiny.
4x4 would probably work.
Well...SirLANsalot wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 9:53 am If you used the tank for the MG, then you were using the tank all kinds of wrong.
You might, but...You use the tank for the damn cannon...
Me and most everyone I've watched play Factorio tend to run the spawners over and use the MG to deal with the bugs and that last spawner the tank stopped against if applicable. You're the first to mention using the MG against spawners.The tank isn't nerfed, more like the MG was bugged or inadvertently buffed to deal double damage. Using the MG to kill bases is a waste of bullets anyways.
I'd prefer buffing the cannon to nerfing the MG. In real life, the effective range of a tank's main cannon is ballpark 4000m, while the machine gun maxes out around 600-1000m. So the cannon should have a much greater range IMHO, at least twice that of the MG.jodokus31 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:32 pm I never used anything else in the tank other than the MG. Its probably interesting to have an incentive to use the shells.