Hello, thanks for the bug report, it is now fixed for the next release.

I added an error message.
We could also try to limit the selection list with the red buttions and reasons, but that would go little bit too deep, this should be enough.

Thanks for the report, it is now fixed for the next version.

Hello, I checked it in the current version, and it seems to work just fine.
Obviously, the chest request is set to 0 (as you can't request any quality), but it works.

I guess it is the same problem as this viewtopic.php?t=126136, which I just fixed for the next release.

Ok, so by investigating this bug report, I fixed 3 different things.
1) The game was generating self-recycling recipes for parameters (which is nonsense and was removed)
2) Normally you can't select a signal item which is type of item which isn't in the inventory (to avoid confusion, as you wouldn't ...

Hello, thanks for the bug report.
Yes, somehow it was always assumed only parameters and not named non-parameters would be export/imported.
This has been now fixed for the next version.

Can't really make it in a reasonable way, parametrising and relative snap to grid just isn't compatibile (absolute grid still works fine).

I agree that extending the behaviour of "clearing" might be useful here.
I hope I don't break something by this change, but for the next version, decider combinator conditions which would be evaluated to empty signal on the left side of the comparison are just deleted isntead of kept empty.

Hm, for some reason, it wasn't handled properly, so I fixed for the next version.
When the id is used both as item as an a recipe, it will properly filter both the item condition + the recipe crafting machine condition.

I fixed the bug of the UI for selecting parameter offering quality selection in the case, when quality is supposed to be kept and taken from the blueprint instead.
It works like that for all other types (recipe, fluid etc.), but for some reason, the code didn't distinquish it for item IDs.

The # of parameters is never saved nor configurable (to keep the already complicated UI not even more complicated).
We never anticipated that you would need specifically third parameter, and not the first and second.

Hello, I'm not able to comprehend what is the actual bug you are trying to explain.
I tried to guess that you mean that any quality changes to normal in splitter, but I tested that and it isn't the case.
I opened the blueprint book, and I don't understand what do you mean by "works" or doesn't work ...

Duplicite: 119866

Also this: 127748 (which was resolved)

I don't know what to say.
This result might be a bit unexpected but the game is doing exactly what it is supposed to do.
When you rename a station it just changes all references to that station. It is kind of weird to have station which uses these special signal, and even named the same way as ...

Hello, I can't reproduce it, when I reselect new blueprint, the static value and the formula are preserved.

Hello, thanks for the report, it is now fixed for the next version.

Seems like it, but shouldn't running out of power immediately update the position to avoid such jumps?


The performance optimization means that it doesn't actually check the power level at every point. Seems like it's not checking for how much power is left until after it tries to subtract how ...

Hello, I tested this in the current version, and it seems to be fixed already.