I think train routing is subtly broken, but…
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 1:10 am
Why does it do this? Or rather, why doesn't it take the lane that is advertised (intentionally) as open?
Both reach the same station.
The left lane that it decides is less good (but which has space for more than one train) already *has* six trains. The right lane has none. Thus… more red signals are bad? But what did the sixth train take this lane, just like the other five have?
ObOnTopic: how do I ensure trains take lane 2 *only* if lane 1 is full? That red signal (let's call it B) is therefore tied to the green one (let's call it A), with B being red as long as A is green.
(It's of course very likely not a bug, because whenever I think it is, it's "Working as intended" (which is a programmer euphemism for "bug/misfeature, we just hate to admit it"))
Both reach the same station.
The left lane that it decides is less good (but which has space for more than one train) already *has* six trains. The right lane has none. Thus… more red signals are bad? But what did the sixth train take this lane, just like the other five have?
ObOnTopic: how do I ensure trains take lane 2 *only* if lane 1 is full? That red signal (let's call it B) is therefore tied to the green one (let's call it A), with B being red as long as A is green.
(It's of course very likely not a bug, because whenever I think it is, it's "Working as intended" (which is a programmer euphemism for "bug/misfeature, we just hate to admit it"))