Predecessor Fusion Reactors
Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:10 am
The portable fusion reactor seems a bit out-of-nowhere. It's obviously a very advanced device which should have predecessor devices, but doesn't.
To rectify this, I propose adding two other fusion reactors which are unlocked earlier in the tech tree.
1. A big, building-sized reactor which hooks up to the new heat-exchangers for producing power. Would run on deuterium extracted from water via a couple of chemical plant recipes (heavy water extraction (100 water in, 1 heavy water out), heavy water electrolysis (2 heavy water in, 2 deuterium out (ignoring the 1 waste oxygen which would go with a more realistic implementation))). Yes, I know real-world reactors are likely to use tritium as well, but let's just keep things simple for now. Maybe also require a jolt of electricity to get started initially or if it shuts down due to the deuterium supply running out and needs to be restarted.
2. A much smaller reactor with a smaller output. If you were transporting it in real life, you could fit two or three on a train car, so let's make it 2*2 tiles with an output of something like 10MW (exact value to be determined). Enough to power laser turrets for a small outpost. Would generate power directly rather than needing steam infrastructure. Could run off barrels of deuterium, so it's not set-and-forget just yet.
3. The existing portable fusion reactor, which would sit at the end of the fusion power research branch of the tech tree.
This gives us a nice progression from big, bulky and high maintenance, to small, compact, and no maintenance.
To rectify this, I propose adding two other fusion reactors which are unlocked earlier in the tech tree.
1. A big, building-sized reactor which hooks up to the new heat-exchangers for producing power. Would run on deuterium extracted from water via a couple of chemical plant recipes (heavy water extraction (100 water in, 1 heavy water out), heavy water electrolysis (2 heavy water in, 2 deuterium out (ignoring the 1 waste oxygen which would go with a more realistic implementation))). Yes, I know real-world reactors are likely to use tritium as well, but let's just keep things simple for now. Maybe also require a jolt of electricity to get started initially or if it shuts down due to the deuterium supply running out and needs to be restarted.
2. A much smaller reactor with a smaller output. If you were transporting it in real life, you could fit two or three on a train car, so let's make it 2*2 tiles with an output of something like 10MW (exact value to be determined). Enough to power laser turrets for a small outpost. Would generate power directly rather than needing steam infrastructure. Could run off barrels of deuterium, so it's not set-and-forget just yet.
3. The existing portable fusion reactor, which would sit at the end of the fusion power research branch of the tech tree.
This gives us a nice progression from big, bulky and high maintenance, to small, compact, and no maintenance.