Should Gleba and Vulcanus have been swapped?
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2025 8:51 am
Vulcanus is the planet closest to the sun, thus providing the best solar panels of any planet.
Except, a single Chemical Plant making steam from calcite and acid is outperforming them all.
Solar panels feel completely wasted on Vulcanus given how trivial it is to make power from steam turbines.
Meanwhile Gleba is even further away then Nauvis and has less effective solar panels all the while being heavily reliant on the incredibly energy hungry tesla turrets for the late game as they are clearly the best defense against stompers.
The main way to produce power on Gleba is to burn waste (and maybe rocket fuel).
Personally, I've just set up a nuclear reactor on Gleba with a space ship occasionally delivering some fuel cells. For me, the amount of spoilage I produce just cannot possible provide a full perimeter with testla turrets and while I could substitute it with rocket fuel or try and ramp up production I just don't see the point when a nuclear reactor takes care of all of that.
I guess maybe the idea is that you'd have fusion reactors by the time big stompers become a problem but even so, I feel it would have been nicer to have the good panels on Gleba instead.
(On a side note, it would also have been interesting to have some varying day vs. night lengths much like real life. Heck, you could even have the planet closest to the sun tidally locked in perma-day.)
Except, a single Chemical Plant making steam from calcite and acid is outperforming them all.
Solar panels feel completely wasted on Vulcanus given how trivial it is to make power from steam turbines.
Meanwhile Gleba is even further away then Nauvis and has less effective solar panels all the while being heavily reliant on the incredibly energy hungry tesla turrets for the late game as they are clearly the best defense against stompers.
The main way to produce power on Gleba is to burn waste (and maybe rocket fuel).
Personally, I've just set up a nuclear reactor on Gleba with a space ship occasionally delivering some fuel cells. For me, the amount of spoilage I produce just cannot possible provide a full perimeter with testla turrets and while I could substitute it with rocket fuel or try and ramp up production I just don't see the point when a nuclear reactor takes care of all of that.
I guess maybe the idea is that you'd have fusion reactors by the time big stompers become a problem but even so, I feel it would have been nicer to have the good panels on Gleba instead.
(On a side note, it would also have been interesting to have some varying day vs. night lengths much like real life. Heck, you could even have the planet closest to the sun tidally locked in perma-day.)