Efficiency of longer heat pipes
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2025 3:13 am
Just a small question about nuclear power. I was not able to find a conclusive answer in the wiki.
TL;DR: Does the temperature of a heatpipe connected to a heat exchanger actually matter, as long it is above 500 degrees?
As far as i understand, turbine need 500 degrees steam made in a heat exchanger, and if the heatpipe connected to the heat exchanger is not at least 500 degrees hot, it does not do anything.
But do higher temperatures at the heat exchanger matter?
If they do matter, i assume it would be better to pipe steam to the turbines and make the exchanger setup more compact.
At the moment my setup is as follows: From each reactor i have a single heat pipe going to a douple row of heat exchangers, and to each exchangers i have directly connected two turbines. This makes somewhat long heat pipes, at the furthest away i am at ~850 degrees,
According to the power statistics this seems to be able to produce the full amount, but i do not consume nearly enough at the moment to verify.
TL;DR: Does the temperature of a heatpipe connected to a heat exchanger actually matter, as long it is above 500 degrees?
As far as i understand, turbine need 500 degrees steam made in a heat exchanger, and if the heatpipe connected to the heat exchanger is not at least 500 degrees hot, it does not do anything.
But do higher temperatures at the heat exchanger matter?
If they do matter, i assume it would be better to pipe steam to the turbines and make the exchanger setup more compact.
At the moment my setup is as follows: From each reactor i have a single heat pipe going to a douple row of heat exchangers, and to each exchangers i have directly connected two turbines. This makes somewhat long heat pipes, at the furthest away i am at ~850 degrees,
According to the power statistics this seems to be able to produce the full amount, but i do not consume nearly enough at the moment to verify.