Page 1 of 1

[2.0.23] Inconsistent rail signal placement options

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2024 10:13 pm
by Petrichor_Nova
Rail signal placement availability does not seem to be consistent, generally along slight angle track curves when connected to a 45 degree angle, as seen on the left side. Right side represents standard availability of signal placement for slight curved rails.
Screenshot_20241214_150429.png
Screenshot_20241214_150429.png (4.91 MiB) Viewed 279 times
Red boxes indicate where I had assumed signals should be able to be placed, especially due to the signal placement availability in the blue box underneath. I would assume this has something to do with spacing and the code, as the signals are able to be placed normally so long as there is two rail's worth of space between each curve, but if specifically there is another curve one track-spaced below, you cannot place a signal on that short curve.

I do hope this is somewhat coherent of a report

Re: [2.0.23] Inconsistent rail signal placement options

Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2024 12:30 am
by Jap2.0
You can copy and paste a signal from the blue box to the red boxes, but it will give the error "cannot divide segments"

Re: [2.0.23] Inconsistent rail signal placement options

Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2024 12:39 am
by Jap2.0
Not a bug or minor issue; this appears to be a result of 116415, as when you place a curve that close below one of its collision boxes overlaps both segments.
12-14-2024, 18-39-38.png
12-14-2024, 18-39-38.png (4.79 MiB) Viewed 258 times